You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Carbon nanotube bumps for the flip chip packaging system
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Discover Nano, February 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1556-276x-7-105 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chin Chong Yap, Christophe Brun, Dunlin Tan, Hong Li, Edwin Hang Tong Teo, Dominique Baillargeat, Beng Kang Tay |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | 5% |
| Singapore | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 20 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 32% |
| Researcher | 7 | 32% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 18% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 3 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 11 | 50% |
| Materials Science | 4 | 18% |
| Chemical Engineering | 2 | 9% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 4 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2018.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Discover Nano
#227
of 1,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,885
of 253,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Discover Nano
#13
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,146 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,979 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.