↓ Skip to main content

The ability of cancer-specific and generic preference-based instruments to discriminate across clinical and self-reported measures of cancer severities

Overview of attention for article published in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The ability of cancer-specific and generic preference-based instruments to discriminate across clinical and self-reported measures of cancer severities
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, January 2011
DOI 10.1186/1477-7525-9-106
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paulos Teckle, Stuart Peacock, Helen McTaggart-Cowan, Kim van der Hoek, Stephen Chia, Barb Melosky, Karen Gelmon

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 46 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 24%
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Other 5 10%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Other 10 20%
Unknown 6 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 12%
Social Sciences 5 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 10 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2016.
All research outputs
#8,332,006
of 13,293,718 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#834
of 1,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,908
of 359,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#58
of 147 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,293,718 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,459 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,757 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 147 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.