↓ Skip to main content

Occlusive dressings and gauze dressings did not differ for healing open wounds in surgical patients

Overview of attention for article published in Evidence Based Nursing, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Occlusive dressings and gauze dressings did not differ for healing open wounds in surgical patients
Published in
Evidence Based Nursing, April 2009
DOI 10.1136/ebn.12.2.52
Pubmed ID
Authors

G. Gethin

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 2 29%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 14%
Student > Master 1 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 14%
Researcher 1 14%
Other 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 86%
Unspecified 1 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2018.
All research outputs
#3,908,406
of 13,199,565 outputs
Outputs from Evidence Based Nursing
#273
of 808 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,725
of 261,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Evidence Based Nursing
#14
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,199,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 808 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,800 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.