↓ Skip to main content

A Pervaporation Study of Ammonia Solutions Using Molecular Sieve Silica Membranes

Overview of attention for article published in Membranes, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#15 of 194)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
A Pervaporation Study of Ammonia Solutions Using Molecular Sieve Silica Membranes
Published in
Membranes, February 2014
DOI 10.3390/membranes4010040
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xing Yang, Thomas Fraser, Darli Myat, Simon Smart, Jianhua Zhang, João Diniz da Costa, Audra Liubinas, Mikel Duke

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 35 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 22%
Researcher 7 19%
Student > Master 5 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 3 8%
Other 11 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemical Engineering 11 30%
Engineering 7 19%
Unspecified 6 16%
Environmental Science 6 16%
Chemistry 3 8%
Other 4 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2018.
All research outputs
#3,486,930
of 12,189,308 outputs
Outputs from Membranes
#15
of 194 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,910
of 214,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Membranes
#3
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,189,308 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,335 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.