# Line shifts in accretion disks—the case of Fe K α $\alpha$

Overview of attention for article published in Astrophysics & Space Science, January 2016

• Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
• Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

2 tweeters

## Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title Line shifts in accretion disks—the case of Fe K α $\alpha$ Astrophysics & Space Science, January 2016 10.1007/s10509-016-2653-z P. Jovanović, V. Borka Jovanović, D. Borka, L. Č. Popović

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

### Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

### Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 67%
Professor 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 5 83%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 17%

## Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2016.
All research outputs
#11,071,586
of 14,568,111 outputs
Outputs from Astrophysics & Space Science
#753
of 1,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#230,218
of 365,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Astrophysics & Space Science
#32
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,568,111 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,853 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,732 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.