↓ Skip to main content

‘Not your daughter’s Facebook’: Twitter use at the European Society of Cardiology Conference 2018

Overview of attention for article published in Heart, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
112 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
‘Not your daughter’s Facebook’: Twitter use at the European Society of Cardiology Conference 2018
Published in
Heart, October 2018
DOI 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-314163
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah Hudson, Graham Mackenzie

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 112 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2019.
All research outputs
#229,198
of 12,550,672 outputs
Outputs from Heart
#145
of 3,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,324
of 292,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Heart
#18
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,550,672 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,879 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,854 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.