↓ Skip to main content

Negative pressure wound therapy for treating foot wounds in people with diabetes mellitus

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
60 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Negative pressure wound therapy for treating foot wounds in people with diabetes mellitus
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010318.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhenmi Liu, Jo C Dumville, Robert J Hinchliffe, Nicky Cullum, Fran Game, Nikki Stubbs, Michael Sweeting, Frank Peinemann

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 60 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 75 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 23%
Student > Master 15 20%
Unspecified 9 12%
Researcher 9 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Other 17 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 53%
Unspecified 11 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 12%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 11 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2019.
All research outputs
#423,005
of 12,875,491 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,352
of 10,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,030
of 306,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#31
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,875,491 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,460 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,458 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.