↓ Skip to main content

Negative pressure wound therapy for treating foot wounds in people with diabetes mellitus

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
55 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
259 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Negative pressure wound therapy for treating foot wounds in people with diabetes mellitus
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010318.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhenmi Liu, Jo C Dumville, Robert J Hinchliffe, Nicky Cullum, Fran Game, Nikki Stubbs, Michael Sweeting, Frank Peinemann

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 55 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 259 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 259 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 50 19%
Student > Master 36 14%
Researcher 29 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 9%
Student > Postgraduate 21 8%
Other 45 17%
Unknown 54 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 86 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 45 17%
Social Sciences 11 4%
Engineering 10 4%
Psychology 7 3%
Other 37 14%
Unknown 63 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2020.
All research outputs
#608,881
of 16,027,726 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,602
of 11,360 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,524
of 328,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#32
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,027,726 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,360 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.