You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Cadmium Tissue Concentrations in Kidney, Liver and Muscle in Moose (Alces alces) From First Nations Communities in Northern Alberta
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, October 2018
Claire McAuley, Ave Dersch, Stacey Mouille-Malbeuf, Bart Koppe, Darryel Sowan
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||1||50%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||1||50%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||3||17%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||2||11%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Arts and Humanities||1||6%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||1||6%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||1||6%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2018.
All research outputs
of 23,106,934 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
of 1,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 348,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,106,934 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,706 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,576 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.