↓ Skip to main content

Exercise therapy in juvenile idiopathic arthritis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
129 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exercise therapy in juvenile idiopathic arthritis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005954.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tim Takken, Marco Van Brussel, Raoul H.H. Engelbert, Janjaap J van der Net, Wietse Kuis, Paul PJM Helders

Abstract

Exercise therapy is considered an important component of the treatment of arthritis. The efficacy of exercise therapy has been reviewed in adults with rheumatoid arthritis but not in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Papua New Guinea 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 121 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 26%
Student > Bachelor 28 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 12%
Unspecified 13 10%
Researcher 12 9%
Other 27 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 18%
Unspecified 21 16%
Psychology 8 6%
Social Sciences 7 5%
Other 18 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2019.
All research outputs
#1,382,020
of 13,343,384 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,957
of 10,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,954
of 210,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#207
of 520 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,343,384 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,558 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,105 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 520 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.