↓ Skip to main content

Critically appraised topic on adverse food reactions of companion animals (2): common food allergen sources in dogs and cats

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Veterinary Research, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 2,407)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
283 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Critically appraised topic on adverse food reactions of companion animals (2): common food allergen sources in dogs and cats
Published in
BMC Veterinary Research, January 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12917-016-0633-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ralf S. Mueller, Thierry Olivry, Pascal Prélaud

Abstract

To diagnose cutaneous adverse food reactions (CAFRs) in dogs and cats, dietary restriction-provocation trials are performed. Knowing the most common offending food allergens for these species would help determining the order of food challenges to optimize the time to diagnosis. The search for, and review and analysis of the best evidence available as of January 16, 2015 suggests that the most likely food allergens contributing to canine CAFRs are beef, dairy products, chicken, and wheat. The most common food allergens in cats are beef, fish and chicken. In dogs and cats, after a period of dietary restriction leading to the complete remission of clinical signs, food challenges to diagnose CAFR should begin with beef and dairy products, the most commonly recognized food allergens in these two species.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 283 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 111 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 19 17%
Student > Master 18 16%
Student > Bachelor 13 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 11%
Student > Postgraduate 10 9%
Other 25 22%
Unknown 15 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 67 60%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Chemical Engineering 1 <1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 16 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 181. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2020.
All research outputs
#109,789
of 16,301,306 outputs
Outputs from BMC Veterinary Research
#2
of 2,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,002
of 373,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Veterinary Research
#1
of 193 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,301,306 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,407 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,869 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 193 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.