↓ Skip to main content

Failing to Ignore: Paradoxical Neural Effects of Perceptual Load on Early Attentional Selection in Normal Aging

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuroscience, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Failing to Ignore: Paradoxical Neural Effects of Perceptual Load on Early Attentional Selection in Normal Aging
Published in
Journal of Neuroscience, November 2010
DOI 10.1523/jneurosci.2687-10.2010
Pubmed ID
Authors

T. W. Schmitz, F. H. T. Cheng, E. De Rosa

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Canada 3 3%
Germany 2 2%
Austria 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 100 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 23%
Researcher 23 21%
Student > Bachelor 20 18%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 6%
Student > Master 7 6%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 14 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 58 52%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 12%
Neuroscience 12 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 15 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2016.
All research outputs
#14,031,034
of 17,583,573 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroscience
#18,848
of 21,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#262,626
of 377,462 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroscience
#293
of 295 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,583,573 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,091 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 377,462 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 295 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.