↓ Skip to main content

Identifying management-relevant research priorities for responding to disease-associated amphibian declines

Overview of attention for article published in Global Ecology and Conservation, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identifying management-relevant research priorities for responding to disease-associated amphibian declines
Published in
Global Ecology and Conservation, October 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.gecco.2018.e00441
Authors

Evan H. Campbell Grant, Michael J. Adams, Robert N. Fisher, Daniel A. Grear, Brian J. Halstead, Blake R. Hossack, Erin Muths, Katherine L.D. Richgels, Robin E. Russell, Kelly L. Smalling, J. Hardin Waddle, Susan C. Walls, C. LeAnn White

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 32%
Researcher 7 23%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Unspecified 2 6%
Other 6 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 42%
Environmental Science 5 16%
Unspecified 3 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 10%
Computer Science 2 6%
Other 5 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2018.
All research outputs
#6,842,261
of 12,892,079 outputs
Outputs from Global Ecology and Conservation
#228
of 379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,467
of 305,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Ecology and Conservation
#18
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,892,079 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.1. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,077 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.