↓ Skip to main content

Women’s psychological experiences of physiological childbirth: a meta-synthesis

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Open, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
73 tweeters
facebook
14 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
375 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Women’s psychological experiences of physiological childbirth: a meta-synthesis
Published in
BMJ Open, October 2018
DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020347
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ibone Olza, Patricia Leahy-Warren, Yael Benyamini, Maria Kazmierczak, Sigfridur Inga Karlsdottir, Andria Spyridou, Esther Crespo-Mirasol, Lea Takács, Priscilla J Hall, Margaret Murphy, Sigridur Sia Jonsdottir, Soo Downe, Marianne J Nieuwenhuijze

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 73 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 375 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 375 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 52 14%
Student > Master 42 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 9%
Researcher 22 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 5%
Other 68 18%
Unknown 140 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 91 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 42 11%
Psychology 28 7%
Social Sciences 16 4%
Arts and Humanities 8 2%
Other 36 10%
Unknown 154 41%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 69. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2022.
All research outputs
#544,628
of 23,380,821 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#945
of 23,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,071
of 349,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#19
of 471 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,380,821 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,170 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,975 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 471 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.