↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of the role of the cannabidiol system in an animal model of ischemia/reperfusion kidney injury

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of the role of the cannabidiol system in an animal model of ischemia/reperfusion kidney injury
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva, January 2015
DOI 10.5935/0103-507x.20150064
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rodrigo Zon Soares, Francieli Vuolo, Dhébora Mozena Dall’Igna, Monique Michels, José Alexandre de Souza Crippa, Jaime Eduardo Cecílio Hallak, Antonio Waldo Zuardi, Felipe Dal-Pizzol

Abstract

This work aimed to investigate the effects of the administration of cannabidiol in a kidney ischemia/reperfusion animal model. Kidney injury was induced by 45 minutes of renal ischemia followed by reperfusion. Cannabidiol (5mg/kg) was administered immediately after reperfusion. Ischemia/reperfusion increased the IL-1 and TNF levels, and these levels were attenuated by cannabidiol treatment. Additionally, cannabidiol was able to decrease lipid and protein oxidative damage, but not the nitrite/nitrate levels. Kidney injury after ischemia/reperfusion seemed to be independent of the cannabidiol receptor 1 and cannabidiol receptor 2 (CB1 and CB2) expression levels, as there was no significant increase in these receptors after reperfusion. The cannabidiol treatment had a protective effect against inflammation and oxidative damage in the kidney ischemia/reperfusion model. These effects seemed to be independent of CB1/CB2 receptor activation.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 22%
Student > Bachelor 3 17%
Student > Postgraduate 2 11%
Professor 2 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 4 22%
Unknown 2 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 11%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 11%
Psychology 2 11%
Neuroscience 2 11%
Other 4 22%
Unknown 2 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2021.
All research outputs
#6,050,399
of 18,672,358 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva
#74
of 290 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,344
of 384,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva
#11
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,672,358 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 290 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 384,682 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.