↓ Skip to main content

Auto- versus human-driven plan in mediastinal Hodgkin lymphoma radiation treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Radiation Oncology, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Auto- versus human-driven plan in mediastinal Hodgkin lymphoma radiation treatment
Published in
Radiation Oncology, October 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13014-018-1146-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefania Clemente, Caterina Oliviero, Giuseppe Palma, Vittoria D’Avino, Raffaele Liuzzi, Manuel Conson, Roberto Pacelli, Laura Cella

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 21%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 3 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 26%
Physics and Astronomy 4 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 11%
Social Sciences 2 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 4 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2018.
All research outputs
#15,021,206
of 23,108,064 outputs
Outputs from Radiation Oncology
#918
of 2,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,710
of 349,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiation Oncology
#21
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,108,064 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,079 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,386 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.