↓ Skip to main content

Prevention of Overweight in Infancy (POI.nz) study: a randomised controlled trial of sleep, food and activity interventions for preventing overweight from birth

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
537 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prevention of Overweight in Infancy (POI.nz) study: a randomised controlled trial of sleep, food and activity interventions for preventing overweight from birth
Published in
BMC Public Health, December 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-11-942
Pubmed ID
Authors

Barry J Taylor, Anne-Louise M Heath, Barbara C Galland, Andrew R Gray, Julie A Lawrence, Rachel M Sayers, Kelly Dale, Kirsten J Coppell, Rachael W Taylor

Abstract

Rapid weight gain during the first three years of life predicts child and adult obesity, and also later cardiovascular and other morbidities. Cross-sectional studies suggest that infant diet, activity and sleep are linked to excessive weight gain. As intervention for overweight children is difficult, the aim of the Prevention of Overweight in Infancy (POI.nz) study is to evaluate two primary prevention strategies during late pregnancy and early childhood that could be delivered separately or together as part of normal health care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 537 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
United States 2 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Unknown 530 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 109 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 69 13%
Researcher 53 10%
Student > Bachelor 53 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 4%
Other 89 17%
Unknown 141 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 110 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 92 17%
Psychology 57 11%
Social Sciences 37 7%
Sports and Recreations 24 4%
Other 56 10%
Unknown 161 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2022.
All research outputs
#6,003,885
of 23,202,641 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#6,168
of 15,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,969
of 244,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#56
of 195 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,202,641 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,925 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 195 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.