↓ Skip to main content

Hormone replacement for osteoporosis in women with primary biliary cirrhosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hormone replacement for osteoporosis in women with primary biliary cirrhosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009146.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jelena S Rudic, Goran Poropat, Miodrag N Krstic, Goran Bjelakovic, Christian Gluud

Abstract

Women with primary biliary cirrhosis often suffer from postmenopausal osteoporosis due to their age, or osteoporosis secondary to their liver disease, or treatments provided for their liver disease. Hormone replacement increases bone mineral density and reduces fractures in postmenopausal women. On the other hand, hormone replacement increases the risk of various adverse events. We could not identify any meta-analyses or systematic reviews on hormone replacement in women with primary biliary cirrhosis.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 70 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 22%
Student > Master 14 19%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Other 5 7%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 13 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 53%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 6%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 18 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2011.
All research outputs
#10,023,986
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,370
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,997
of 216,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#433
of 488 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 216,927 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 488 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.