↓ Skip to main content

Medical interventions for acanthamoeba keratitis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Medical interventions for acanthamoeba keratitis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010792.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Majed Alkharashi, Kristina Lindsley, Hua Andrew Law, Shameema Sikder

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 1%
Unknown 68 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 19%
Student > Master 13 19%
Researcher 8 12%
Unspecified 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Other 23 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 52%
Unspecified 9 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 4%
Other 11 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2017.
All research outputs
#3,639,810
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,303
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,243
of 329,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#142
of 190 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,997 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 190 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.