↓ Skip to main content

Probiotics for maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
5 tweeters
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
122 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Probiotics for maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007443.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Khimara Naidoo, Morris Gordon, Andrew O Fagbemi, Adrian G Thomas, Anthony K Akobeng

Abstract

Ulcerative colitis is a chronic relapsing disease characterised by diffuse mucosal inflammation limited to the colon. Current maintenance treatments have multiple adverse events and an effective treatment with minimal adverse events is desired. Several studies have demonstrated the importance of intestinal flora in the pathogenesis of ulcerative colitis. It has been suggested that modifying the bacterial flora with probiotics may attenuate the inflammatory process and prevent relapses in ulcerative colitis.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Spain 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Unknown 141 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 39 27%
Student > Master 27 18%
Researcher 16 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 8%
Other 11 8%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 28 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 6%
Other 17 12%
Unknown 31 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2019.
All research outputs
#1,177,653
of 14,537,063 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,382
of 10,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,043
of 213,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#159
of 505 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,537,063 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,988 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,269 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 505 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.