↓ Skip to main content

Skin preparation for preventing infection following caesarean section

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
9 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
149 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Skin preparation for preventing infection following caesarean section
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007462.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Diah R Hadiati, Mohammad Hakimi, Detty S Nurdiati, Katharina da Silva Lopes, Erika Ota

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 149 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 18%
Student > Bachelor 21 14%
Researcher 21 14%
Student > Postgraduate 15 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 8%
Other 26 17%
Unknown 27 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 17%
Social Sciences 8 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 3%
Other 21 14%
Unknown 32 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2020.
All research outputs
#1,370,381
of 17,036,910 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,533
of 11,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,188
of 329,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#49
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,036,910 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,616 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,922 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.