↓ Skip to main content

Skin preparation for preventing infection following caesarean section

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Skin preparation for preventing infection following caesarean section
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007462.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Diah R Hadiati, Mohammad Hakimi, Detty S Nurdiati, Katharina da Silva Lopes, Erika Ota

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 165 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 22%
Student > Bachelor 24 14%
Researcher 23 14%
Student > Postgraduate 22 13%
Unspecified 15 9%
Other 48 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 99 59%
Unspecified 20 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 9%
Social Sciences 9 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 20 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2019.
All research outputs
#2,492,806
of 13,612,446 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,349
of 10,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,290
of 309,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#65
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,612,446 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,678 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,641 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.