↓ Skip to main content

Resprouting and seeding hypotheses: a test of the gap-dependent model using resprouting and obligate seeding subspecies of Arctostaphylos

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Ecology, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Resprouting and seeding hypotheses: a test of the gap-dependent model using resprouting and obligate seeding subspecies of Arctostaphylos
Published in
Plant Ecology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11258-015-0551-z
Authors

Jon E. Keeley, V. Thomas Parker, Michael C. Vasey

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 44 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 24%
Researcher 9 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Professor 4 9%
Other 11 24%
Unknown 1 2%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 59%
Environmental Science 12 26%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2016.
All research outputs
#7,700,861
of 12,323,473 outputs
Outputs from Plant Ecology
#269
of 539 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,791
of 339,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Ecology
#14
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,323,473 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 539 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,630 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.