↓ Skip to main content

Assessing Alternative Poverty Proxy Methods in Rural Vietnam

Overview of attention for article published in Oxford Development Studies, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessing Alternative Poverty Proxy Methods in Rural Vietnam
Published in
Oxford Development Studies, September 2011
DOI 10.1080/13600818.2011.599207
Authors

Linh Vu, Bob Baulch

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 5%
United Kingdom 1 5%
Unknown 20 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Lecturer 1 5%
Professor 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 7 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 23%
Social Sciences 4 18%
Psychology 2 9%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 7 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2016.
All research outputs
#13,454,350
of 22,840,638 outputs
Outputs from Oxford Development Studies
#289
of 370 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,708
of 125,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oxford Development Studies
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,840,638 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 370 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,265 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them