↓ Skip to main content

Aphasia websites: An examination of their quality and communicative accessibility

Overview of attention for article published in Aphasiology, December 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Aphasia websites: An examination of their quality and communicative accessibility
Published in
Aphasiology, December 2005
DOI 10.1080/02687030500337871
Authors

Carlye Ghidella, Stephen Murray, Melanie Smart, Kryss McKenna, Linda Worrall

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 7%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 26 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 17%
Researcher 5 17%
Student > Postgraduate 3 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Other 5 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 10 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 10%
Linguistics 3 10%
Unspecified 3 10%
Computer Science 3 10%
Other 7 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2016.
All research outputs
#7,108,810
of 12,366,907 outputs
Outputs from Aphasiology
#231
of 350 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,282
of 336,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aphasiology
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,366,907 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 350 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,619 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.