↓ Skip to main content

Prokinetics for functional dyspepsia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
19 tweeters
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prokinetics for functional dyspepsia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009431.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rapat Pittayanon, Yuhong Yuan, Natasha P Bollegala, Reena Khanna, Grigorios I Leontiadis, Paul Moayyedi

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 23%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Student > Master 4 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Other 3 6%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 14 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 17 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2020.
All research outputs
#978,100
of 16,283,880 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,660
of 11,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,724
of 326,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#42
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,283,880 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,465 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,533 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.