↓ Skip to main content

Prokinetics for functional dyspepsia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
19 tweeters
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prokinetics for functional dyspepsia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009431.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rapat Pittayanon, Yuhong Yuan, Natasha P Bollegala, Reena Khanna, Grigorios I Leontiadis, Paul Moayyedi

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 27%
Student > Master 5 19%
Student > Bachelor 4 15%
Unspecified 4 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Other 3 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 50%
Unspecified 5 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 8%
Decision Sciences 1 4%
Other 3 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2019.
All research outputs
#1,473,484
of 13,555,878 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,082
of 10,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,842
of 308,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#55
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,555,878 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,645 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,840 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.