↓ Skip to main content

Can Fire and Rescue Services and the National Health Service work together to improve the safety and wellbeing of vulnerable older people? Design of a proof of concept study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
184 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Can Fire and Rescue Services and the National Health Service work together to improve the safety and wellbeing of vulnerable older people? Design of a proof of concept study
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, December 2010
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-10-327
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karen Lowton, Anne H Laybourne, David G Whiting, Finbarr C Martin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
United States 2 1%
India 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 175 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 38 21%
Student > Master 30 16%
Student > Bachelor 22 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 34 18%
Unknown 31 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 22%
Social Sciences 25 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 13%
Psychology 10 5%
Sports and Recreations 8 4%
Other 37 20%
Unknown 39 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2016.
All research outputs
#14,832,901
of 22,840,638 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#5,369
of 7,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,036
of 180,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#20
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,840,638 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,640 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,286 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.