↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy of adjunctive Garcinia mangostana Linn (mangosteen) pericarp for bipolar depression: study protocol for a proof-of-concept trial

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
143 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Efficacy of adjunctive Garcinia mangostana Linn (mangosteen) pericarp for bipolar depression: study protocol for a proof-of-concept trial
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria, May 2019
DOI 10.1590/1516-4446-2018-0114
Pubmed ID
Authors

Melanie M. Ashton, Michael Berk, Chee H. Ng, Malcolm Hopwood, Seetal Dodd, Alyna Turner, Ellie Brown, Felice N. Jacka, Susan M. Cotton, Jon-Paul Khoo, Mary Lou Chatterton, Bianca E. Kavanagh, Sarah E. Nadjidai, Samantha L. Lo Monaco, Brian H. Harvey, Jerome Sarris, Gin S. Malhi, Nathan L. Dowling, Olivia M. Dean

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 143 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 12%
Student > Bachelor 15 10%
Researcher 14 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 31 22%
Unknown 48 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 22%
Psychology 16 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Neuroscience 5 3%
Other 21 15%
Unknown 52 36%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2019.
All research outputs
#6,426,131
of 21,562,248 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria
#212
of 437 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,469
of 343,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,562,248 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 437 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,583 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them