Data Sharing

@felixjannitsch @_open_science_ @juli_tkotz @rimamrahal https://t.co/uyCOVHAezg false-positive psychology paper https://t.co/WjnxNp5T9j https://t.co/cFWUFugR0Y

@cantabile @MMetaresearch @rmflight Here's the original source: https://t.co/ZNElsMEypD

@aimeezun @RetractionWatch https://t.co/wHIhzNVlr3

RT @alastairdunning: @gravana @martateperek @nejm were very critical of data sharing earlier, using the term 'research parasites'. It's com…

RT @alastairdunning: @gravana @martateperek @nejm were very critical of data sharing earlier, using the term 'research parasites'. It's com…

RT @alastairdunning: @gravana @martateperek @nejm were very critical of data sharing earlier, using the term 'research parasites'. It's com…

RT @alastairdunning: @gravana @martateperek @nejm were very critical of data sharing earlier, using the term 'research parasites'. It's com…

RT @alastairdunning: @gravana @martateperek @nejm were very critical of data sharing earlier, using the term 'research parasites'. It's com…

RT @alastairdunning: @gravana @martateperek @nejm were very critical of data sharing earlier, using the term 'research parasites'. It's com…

RT @alastairdunning: @gravana @martateperek @nejm were very critical of data sharing earlier, using the term 'research parasites'. It's com…

RT @alastairdunning: @gravana @martateperek @nejm were very critical of data sharing earlier, using the term 'research parasites'. It's com…

RT @alastairdunning: @gravana @martateperek @nejm were very critical of data sharing earlier, using the term 'research parasites'. It's com…

RT @alastairdunning: @gravana @martateperek @nejm were very critical of data sharing earlier, using the term 'research parasites'. It's com…

RT @alastairdunning: @gravana @martateperek @nejm were very critical of data sharing earlier, using the term 'research parasites'. It's com…

RT @alastairdunning: @gravana @martateperek @nejm were very critical of data sharing earlier, using the term 'research parasites'. It's com…

RT @alastairdunning: @gravana @martateperek @nejm were very critical of data sharing earlier, using the term 'research parasites'. It's com…

RT @alastairdunning: @gravana @martateperek @nejm were very critical of data sharing earlier, using the term 'research parasites'. It's com…

@gravana @martateperek @nejm were very critical of data sharing earlier, using the term 'research parasites'. It's coming back to haunt them now. https://t.co/gPkGalnOup

@torewig @andersskyrud @NEJM Mer ad NEJM https://t.co/ItrCbkdQgj

@egonwillighagen @MsPhelps @jeroenbosman @jeroenson @rivm Remember Research Parasites? https://t.co/CiJod944t7

@strain_rate @andersskyrud @load_dependent New England har lenge vært gjenstand for kritikk. Dessverre har ikke den kritikken vært så synlig blant norske fagmiljøer, hvor vi stirrer oss blind på impact factor. På tide å endre dette https://t.co/ItrCbkdQgj

RT @Unni_Gopinathan: Troverdighet? Tapt for lenge siden pga (1) Slepphendt publ. av kliniske studier https://t.co/FKuD6KP9Vi (2) Trykker…

RT @Unni_Gopinathan: Troverdighet? Tapt for lenge siden pga (1) Slepphendt publ. av kliniske studier https://t.co/FKuD6KP9Vi (2) Trykker…

RT @Unni_Gopinathan: Troverdighet? Tapt for lenge siden pga (1) Slepphendt publ. av kliniske studier https://t.co/FKuD6KP9Vi (2) Trykker…

RT @Unni_Gopinathan: Troverdighet? Tapt for lenge siden pga (1) Slepphendt publ. av kliniske studier https://t.co/FKuD6KP9Vi (2) Trykker…

Troverdighet? Tapt for lenge siden pga (1) Slepphendt publ. av kliniske studier https://t.co/FKuD6KP9Vi (2) Trykker sjeldent kritikk av egne studier https://t.co/AWFphkeTht (3) Motarbeider datadeling https://t.co/8bfd7xUFGq (4) Lax holdning til COI htt

@SFuentes_Micro @KVittingSeerup @SherlockpHolmes @markrobinsonca This is the view I take, and many of my collaborators. See this for the other view https://t.co/SPXXwCPfp1

RT @mc80york: Mount Vesuvius eruption 'turned victim's brain to glass' #herculaneum Our frustration at @NEJM publishing remarkable claims,…

RT @mc80york: Mount Vesuvius eruption 'turned victim's brain to glass' #herculaneum Our frustration at @NEJM publishing remarkable claims,…

RT @mc80york: Mount Vesuvius eruption 'turned victim's brain to glass' #herculaneum Our frustration at @NEJM publishing remarkable claims,…

Mount Vesuvius eruption 'turned victim's brain to glass' #herculaneum Our frustration at @NEJM publishing remarkable claims,without #OpenData. https://t.co/8SHM05akoe

@cshperspectives @lteytelman just, you know, don't reuse/reanalyze the data! https://t.co/r5eo8Nun2b :)

@rimamrahal Not quite there, but this editorial that argues open data is fertile ground for "research parasites" without own ideas and resources comes quite close! https://t.co/jjRZQrBCAK https://t.co/S0qTtFJ2bS

@MikeBradburn2 However... This is not a problem restricted to "data parasites"(https://t.co/frrN5a4iaQ). Many researchers seem not to understand (or to simply ignore) their own choices of parameters, data collection & analysis when reporting their fin

@MikeBradburn2 However... This is not a problem restricted to "data parasites"(https://t.co/90tMVcrQp5). Many researchers seem not to understand (or to simply ignore) their own choices of parameters, data collection & analysis when reporting their fin

RT @pomyers: @DVervoort94 @NEJM It's all in their data sharing policy, which their editor described in detail (naming a new class of resear…

@DVervoort94 @NEJM It's all in their data sharing policy, which their editor described in detail (naming a new class of researchers: "research parasites", https://t.co/Q1Hxogufau), prompting a later clarification. Hopefully the new @NEJM editor will requi

@MinoritySTEM I used to think so, but the NEJM #researchparasites thing a few years ago really made me rethink that. I now think it varies between individuals (and disciplines). For anyone who missed it: https://t.co/iXXvUzhCPB

@kirstie_j @NEJM ah, the @NEJM pushing back as ever against those pesky research parasites https://t.co/UGYA0ZqjEG

I'd be interested what my twitt-ome thinks about that article, because it makes me kinda sad and angry at the same time: https://t.co/TSm7JeQk3N. Imo, the two "concerns" they have, are not really concerns, but excuses? /1

RT @ericbenchimol: This editorial in @NEJM appears to argue against the idea of #OpenData, arguing that those replicating research with ava…

RT @ericbenchimol: This editorial in @NEJM appears to argue against the idea of #OpenData, arguing that those replicating research with ava…

The idea of #OpenData presented in this editorial is really a collaboration of two groups with a vested interest in publishing their results, not an independent assessment of the veracity of the research! https://t.co/vuTHIK8rhX

This editorial in @NEJM appears to argue against the idea of #OpenData, arguing that those replicating research with available data are "research parasites" - WOW! I couldn't disagree more. https://t.co/vuTHIK8rhX

@BioMickWatson @PatSchloss @kristenobacter @surt_lab @robdfinn God forbid we play into the argument of Drazen: https://t.co/fHo26YwOja

@BioMickWatson @HarmitMalik Ahhh, I generate data when I need to, but if there is already a well designed study with appropriate samples then I’m proud to be a research parasite! 🦠 https://t.co/uwd20YroI1

@AnantBhan @PriyankaPulla @NEJM https://t.co/jZHukLMbFx

@SantiagoSchnell @ruth_baker My thought exactly! Sounds like an implicit territorial protectionism as described vividly in this editorial 👇 https://t.co/rfhfZ6p2Dt

@hydrogo89 @fkratzert @LukGudmundsson @NCAR_Science @G_Thirel @Hydro_research @GionataGhiggi Maybe people are afraid of "research parasites" in hydrology too? ;) ( https://t.co/oN1Mtvq86L ) Sometimes people can strange in this ways : / https://t.co/cnc

RT @JavierHerrero7: .@GreeneScientist — After the controversy on ‘research parasites’ (see https://t.co/aBGwIlZAS5 and https://t.co/57AsQAW…

RT @JavierHerrero7: .@GreeneScientist — After the controversy on ‘research parasites’ (see https://t.co/aBGwIlZAS5 and https://t.co/57AsQAW…

RT @JavierHerrero7: .@GreeneScientist — After the controversy on ‘research parasites’ (see https://t.co/aBGwIlZAS5 and https://t.co/57AsQAW…

RT @JavierHerrero7: .@GreeneScientist — After the controversy on ‘research parasites’ (see https://t.co/aBGwIlZAS5 and https://t.co/57AsQAW…

RT @JavierHerrero7: .@GreeneScientist — After the controversy on ‘research parasites’ (see https://t.co/aBGwIlZAS5 and https://t.co/57AsQAW…

RT @JavierHerrero7: .@GreeneScientist — After the controversy on ‘research parasites’ (see https://t.co/aBGwIlZAS5 and https://t.co/57AsQAW…

RT @JavierHerrero7: .@GreeneScientist — After the controversy on ‘research parasites’ (see https://t.co/aBGwIlZAS5 and https://t.co/57AsQAW…

RT @JavierHerrero7: .@GreeneScientist — After the controversy on ‘research parasites’ (see https://t.co/aBGwIlZAS5 and https://t.co/57AsQAW…

RT @JavierHerrero7: .@GreeneScientist — After the controversy on ‘research parasites’ (see https://t.co/aBGwIlZAS5 and https://t.co/57AsQAW…

RT @JavierHerrero7: .@GreeneScientist — After the controversy on ‘research parasites’ (see https://t.co/aBGwIlZAS5 and https://t.co/57AsQAW…

RT @JavierHerrero7: .@GreeneScientist — After the controversy on ‘research parasites’ (see https://t.co/aBGwIlZAS5 and https://t.co/57AsQAW…

RT @JavierHerrero7: .@GreeneScientist — After the controversy on ‘research parasites’ (see https://t.co/aBGwIlZAS5 and https://t.co/57AsQAW…

RT @JavierHerrero7: .@GreeneScientist — After the controversy on ‘research parasites’ (see https://t.co/aBGwIlZAS5 and https://t.co/57AsQAW…

RT @JavierHerrero7: .@GreeneScientist — After the controversy on ‘research parasites’ (see https://t.co/aBGwIlZAS5 and https://t.co/57AsQAW…

RT @JavierHerrero7: .@GreeneScientist — After the controversy on ‘research parasites’ (see https://t.co/aBGwIlZAS5 and https://t.co/57AsQAW…

RT @JavierHerrero7: .@GreeneScientist — After the controversy on ‘research parasites’ (see https://t.co/aBGwIlZAS5 and https://t.co/57AsQAW…

.@GreeneScientist — After the controversy on ‘research parasites’ (see https://t.co/aBGwIlZAS5 and https://t.co/57AsQAWCvj), new awards for researchers re-using data at https://t.co/0UTHhiIG77. Deadline approaching fast (30 Sep) #gi2018

For the record, my own view is (hopefully?) a bit more nuanced: https://t.co/Tg7jp6EVwv https://t.co/9dEVWQgMZY

RT @CT_Bergstrom: A few years ago I was pulled into the #ResearchParasites debate set off by the Longo and Drazen @nejm piece https://t.co/…

I'd rather see sharing, of course, but is it reasonable to expect? My initial attempt at a nuanced view: https://t.co/Tg7jp6EVwv

@hisotalus They're obviously friends with these clowns @NEJM https://t.co/lVyro8gXqg

RT @CT_Bergstrom: A few years ago I was pulled into the #ResearchParasites debate set off by the Longo and Drazen @nejm piece https://t.co/…

@gallantlab @aexbrown @manlius84 Further discussion: https://t.co/Tg7jp6EVwv

RT @CT_Bergstrom: A few years ago I was pulled into the #ResearchParasites debate set off by the Longo and Drazen @nejm piece https://t.co/…

RT @CT_Bergstrom: A few years ago I was pulled into the #ResearchParasites debate set off by the Longo and Drazen @nejm piece https://t.co/…

RT @CT_Bergstrom: A few years ago I was pulled into the #ResearchParasites debate set off by the Longo and Drazen @nejm piece https://t.co/…

RT @CT_Bergstrom: A few years ago I was pulled into the #ResearchParasites debate set off by the Longo and Drazen @nejm piece https://t.co/…

RT @CT_Bergstrom: A few years ago I was pulled into the #ResearchParasites debate set off by the Longo and Drazen @nejm piece https://t.co/…

RT @CT_Bergstrom: A few years ago I was pulled into the #ResearchParasites debate set off by the Longo and Drazen @nejm piece https://t.co/…

Thread on science incentives and consequences. https://t.co/P4YrXcMDua

This issue also applies to biodiversity data and natural history museums. We need "something between citation and authorship" 🤔 https://t.co/bNziVuQ0om

A few years ago I was pulled into the #ResearchParasites debate set off by the Longo and Drazen @nejm piece https://t.co/kNjtAjIve8 1/n

@drugmonkeyblog @DrJenGunter @skepticpedi @AtlasHendrixCo Best example recently was #researchparasite fiasco: NEJM editorial on the 'risk' that data-sharing might mean people could "use the data to try to disprove what the original investigators had posite

@OSFramework Great article. And nice to see that @NEJM is (hopefully) moving away from “research parasites” stance https://t.co/hUDn3qL2K2

@javabunny16 @hmkyale @YODAProject A bit of an inside-research topic, but it started with this editorial in the New England Journal, in which the research insiders criticized "research parasites" and the idea of sharing clinical trial data with other resea

@Shawpsych I've been educating myself because I wanted to understand what a "research parasite" is.... yeah.. there will be researchers who ONLY use other people's data I suppose and use it badly or with inappropriate assumptions. This is the editorial? ht

Then again, in a way it’s refreshing when people are explicit about their views, as it at least makes you a participant in the debate, like De Longo & Drazen on “research parasites” https://t.co/PuwKMConX5

Attitudes to data sharing are very varied: some high profile critics have referred to those using others' data as 'research parasites': https://t.co/2wiMWRiOVs #ISMPPEU18 #medcomms

Artikel in New England Journal of Medicine start discussie over onderzoeksamenwerking: waarom zoveel wetenschappers tegenwoordig die de onderzoeken zelf niet hebben gedaan maar gegevens andermans onderzoeken gebruiken voor publicatie: parasieten? https://t

Esta publicación es una vergüenza https://t.co/AGXbeYaOyE?amp=1

Does NEJM want us to believe that those who practice #reproducible #research are “research parasites”? What happens to meta -analysts? h/t @VinayPrasad82 https://t.co/T42CnwtBtF

I am a data saprophyte, not a data parasite. #SRA2017 https://t.co/WUABxEWM6V

@lcrdm @jeroenbosman I was advocating the use of CC0 over CC-BY for research data, following @ewanbirney who says anyone will cite the data anyway to show that it has a reliable source. I think that was in his response to a controversial editorial in NEJM

RT @elfriesen: @Info_Aus It's contentious. An example is the ugly debate that happened after NEJM published this editorial: https://t.co/s6…

@Info_Aus It's contentious. An example is the ugly debate that happened after NEJM published this editorial: https://t.co/s6O2LSDHXl

Wow!NEJM editrs actually gave voice 2 position that using publishd data frm taxpayer funded research is #parasitic! https://t.co/9IE6ECTOnJ

Feel free to suggest they get a bachelors degree from @PurdueBiochem so they can take BCHM290 and debate that position's merits. https://t.co/CjYTWHlNN0

The horror! "...even use the data to try to disprove what the original investigators had posited" https://t.co/O0UpsjjC3p

Holy cow! Just heard someone genuinely put forth the "you are a research parasite" position! #researchparasite https://t.co/KsIlCFSwZv

@phylogenomics @zazzle Wait, is this t-shirt talking about bioinformatics? https://t.co/key9zalJ5R

@gail_l_rosen @iddux Well, I think some people see it as a threat to those who generate data. See the sentiments in: https://t.co/pufcqB9hnQ