Data Sharing.

RT @richarddmorey: The idea of #researchparasites - that analyzing reported data is "parasitic" is small minded https://t.co/mye2SSKety htt…

RT @elfriesen: @Info_Aus It's contentious. An example is the ugly debate that happened after NEJM published this editorial: https://t.co/s6…

@Info_Aus It's contentious. An example is the ugly debate that happened after NEJM published this editorial: https://t.co/s6O2LSDHXl

Wow!NEJM editrs actually gave voice 2 position that using publishd data frm taxpayer funded research is #parasitic! https://t.co/9IE6ECTOnJ

Feel free to suggest they get a bachelors degree from @PurdueBiochem so they can take BCHM290 and debate that position's merits. https://t.co/CjYTWHlNN0

The horror! "...even use the data to try to disprove what the original investigators had posited" https://t.co/O0UpsjjC3p

Holy cow! Just heard someone genuinely put forth the "you are a research parasite" position! #researchparasite https://t.co/KsIlCFSwZv

@phylogenomics @zazzle Wait, is this t-shirt talking about bioinformatics? https://t.co/key9zalJ5R

@gail_l_rosen @iddux Well, I think some people see it as a threat to those who generate data. See the sentiments in: https://t.co/pufcqB9hnQ

PARASITE accusation in NEJM editorial ‘Data Sharing’, January 2016 https://t.co/mbElYHToXP #urfistopensci

RT @pgerlee: Apparently analysing published data makes you a "parasite": https://t.co/sAqGQd96ZW @NEJM

"or even use the data to try to disprove what the original investigators had posited" - perhaps they shouldn't posit it if disprovable https://t.co/KzPILxdY28

Apparently analysing published data makes you a "parasite": https://t.co/sAqGQd96ZW @NEJM

Art. 34 de ranking de 100 más consultados es s/ Data Sharing - sugiere que compartir no es tan bueno como parece. https://t.co/qRRG9D8p97

RT @cosnet_bifi: https://t.co/NGQ2n2ltgF: “One of the most shockingly anti-science things ever written.” I agree @mbeisen

RT @cosnet_bifi: https://t.co/NGQ2n2ltgF: “One of the most shockingly anti-science things ever written.” I agree @mbeisen

Research parasites? No, researchers who take advantage of data funded with public money to unveil new evidence... https://t.co/nFvZ2nHEGw

https://t.co/NGQ2n2ltgF: “One of the most shockingly anti-science things ever written.” I agree @mbeisen

RT @moorejh: Here is the original data parasite editorial from @NEJM https://t.co/KvEFItAMuX #PSB17 #datascience #bigdata #opendata

RT @moorejh: Here is the original data parasite editorial from @NEJM https://t.co/KvEFItAMuX #PSB17 #datascience #bigdata #opendata

RT @moorejh: Here is the original data parasite editorial from @NEJM https://t.co/KvEFItAMuX #PSB17 #datascience #bigdata #opendata

RT @moorejh: Here is the original data parasite editorial from @NEJM https://t.co/KvEFItAMuX #PSB17 #datascience #bigdata #opendata

RT @moorejh: Here is the original data parasite editorial from @NEJM https://t.co/KvEFItAMuX #PSB17 #datascience #bigdata #opendata

RT @moorejh: Here is the original data parasite editorial from @NEJM https://t.co/KvEFItAMuX #PSB17 #datascience #bigdata #opendata

Here is the original data parasite editorial from @NEJM https://t.co/KvEFItAMuX #PSB17 #datascience #bigdata #opendata

.@CMichaelGibson points to @NEJM characterization of "research parasites" & the backlash from use of this language https://t.co/l51T2kgPCn https://t.co/3Pk4leitSi

RT @bibliosalut: Data sharing https://t.co/SAp31HWhZV @idispaib https://t.co/yDJlN640gA

RT @bibliosalut: Data sharing https://t.co/SAp31HWhZV @idispaib https://t.co/yDJlN640gA

RT @bibliosalut: Data sharing https://t.co/SAp31HWhZV @idispaib https://t.co/yDJlN640gA

Data sharing https://t.co/SAp31HWhZV @idispaib https://t.co/yDJlN640gA

Data Sharing — NEJM https://t.co/p8DhjP3oKa

.@DrJackKruse @mwelting reproducibility and opportunism isn't a problem just for PhDs. See: https://t.co/eCW25SMFGM

PARASITES: The NEJM editorial on Data Sharing https://t.co/n4cVgNmtLh from Jan 2016 #11mc2016

@NEJM @nih_nhlbi @medstro Taking back the "research parasites" op-ed position? https://t.co/9ZRI01oTBK

RT @biotweeps: here is a link to the infamous editorial in NEJM which started the #researchparasites storm https://t.co/sh7zuymi6n

RT @biotweeps: here is a link to the infamous editorial in NEJM which started the #researchparasites storm https://t.co/sh7zuymi6n

here is a link to the infamous editorial in NEJM which started the #researchparasites storm https://t.co/sh7zuymi6n

Maybe because we want to become #researchsymbiont ’s? Avoiding #researchsaprophyte https://t.co/39YhqTNwWT

@statnews @NEJM @zakkohane Great opportunity. Wonder why it isn't called #researchparasites challenge https://t.co/1YDGeVws4s

Do you think researchers using other ppl's data are #researchparasites? Discuss w/ us at 2 PM @ #WHS2016 #openhealth https://t.co/RNr2DvmoAz https://t.co/GsdebchnDb

Anyone else notice that @NEJM misused the term “symbiont” in their #researchparasite editorial? https://t.co/J7KhlO4DIE

RT @dkernohan: *That* NEJM editorial on open data https://t.co/I5duM9WF8k #jiscrdm

'PARASITES' EDITORIAL: opinion on ‘Data Sharing’ Jan 2016 N Engl J Med https://t.co/g8oH5XHFbq #Jisc

*That* NEJM editorial on open data https://t.co/I5duM9WF8k #jiscrdm

RT @angryhacademic: @TSarampalis @chrisdc77 @NEJM subgroup analysis ok as long as its ur data,otherwise youre a #research parasite #sigh ht…

RT @angryhacademic: @TSarampalis @chrisdc77 @NEJM subgroup analysis ok as long as its ur data,otherwise youre a #research parasite #sigh ht…

@TSarampalis @chrisdc77 @NEJM subgroup analysis ok as long as its ur data,otherwise youre a #research parasite #sigh https://t.co/pTG9MCdbbJ

@leonardocandela thanks, it's in response to the recent NEJM editorial https://t.co/gOg5hO6oEo that led to #researchparasite & @dataparasite

"Potential for leveraging existing results for even more benefit pays appropriate tribute to patients" #Data https://t.co/nCMFo9LaVQ @NEJM

NEJM on data sharing and that new class of research person: the "research parasite". And they've not even met me! https://t.co/6hFARqntqK

@joelgrus @St_Rev ah, here we go. https://t.co/k5Yw8C4sps https://t.co/jcQ540m6TK

RT @losinski: Sequel to: https://t.co/8jzaJS2VcI ; cc @dataparasite https://t.co/MXaI7fn8S6

RT @dannykay68: TURNAROUND: NEJM article re fairness in data sharing https://t.co/RpN5ou38rx big shift from 'parasite' editorial https://t.…

TURNAROUND: NEJM article re fairness in data sharing https://t.co/RpN5ou38rx big shift from 'parasite' editorial https://t.co/g8oH5XHFbq

@keithgeraghty "research parasites" https://t.co/J0f0pu2HHj

@CyrilPedia This one was from the editor in chief. https://t.co/uo7reBjsd8

Sequel to: https://t.co/8jzaJS2VcI ; cc @dataparasite https://t.co/MXaI7fn8S6

RT @jpeelle: Stunningly backward editorial from @NEJM on the evils of open data. https://t.co/q50eE6K5dX -> #IAmAResearchParasite https://t…

Data Sharing — NEJM Nonsense. https://t.co/LFzYkoKxvU #IAmAResearchParasite

RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…

Data Sharing = “research parasites”?https://t.co/K2E9IT7MFJ

@florianederer I'm trying to find a university to appoint me as Research Parasite, inspired by https://t.co/PwEXj0iJV5 cc @dataparasite

MEAN vs Meteor.js https://t.co/l23I8jNq0r. I really like the visual analogy of a trolley of parts vs a full car.

Data Sharing — NEJM https://t.co/P6PU0F67Rz

RT @phylogenomics: Editorial by @nejm is simply deranged https://t.co/WzxpdR4zA8 caling those using published data "research parasites" htt…

Rendre les données des 'biobanks' publiques? Bonne ou mauvaise idée? matière à débat. https://t.co/S0hFHL7Y31 @IRIC_umontreal @ChuSteJustine

RT @fgodlee: See NEJM on data sharing https://t.co/xrzYDvkacm. Are secondary analyses parasitical? What about reproduceability? #IAmAResear…

RT @fgodlee: See NEJM on data sharing https://t.co/xrzYDvkacm. Are secondary analyses parasitical? What about reproduceability? #IAmAResear…

RT @jcdrg: https://t.co/snCjq4b8zJ According to NEJM, sharing data could lead people to disprove other people's research (sic). Science as…

Data sharing: "a new class of research person will emerge", ie research parasite. Am I missing something? https://t.co/GP90bPg2yX

RT @MathCancer: I believe the word you're looking for here is "citation", @NEJM. #IAmAResearchParasite https://t.co/fhLCNlVsfr https://t.c…

RT @davidroodman: I am a research parasite https://t.co/dUW4R8efEe

RT @ivanoransky: Logan cites controversial @NEJM "research parasites" editorial #AHCJ16 https://t.co/6dS09lE3AJ

RT @ivanoransky: Logan cites controversial @NEJM "research parasites" editorial #AHCJ16 https://t.co/6dS09lE3AJ

Data Sharing — NEJM https://t.co/U6Qevs8jrk

Logan cites controversial @NEJM "research parasites" editorial #AHCJ16 https://t.co/6dS09lE3AJ

Data beauty: aerial and close-up https://t.co/l1ZFjgMvMP

@kwbroman @donmoyn Must keep the #researchparasites from corrupting beautiful science. https://t.co/8m0DuaU8H1

I am a research parasite https://t.co/dUW4R8efEe

What is a "research parasite?" Is this a problem? https://t.co/ng7fH6gEaG

@andpru @RheeMor e.g. this has an altmetric of 2174 https://t.co/WBmsRVYCVE

Very pertinent question in this editorial. Are we seeing parasitic or symbiotic relationships in Data Sharing: NEJM https://t.co/j1xOrzyVzl

NACDA is getting a lot of questions on Research Parasites at #PAA2016. Read about it at NEJM https://t.co/5nnBnusVec

#DataSharing — NEJM https://t.co/aXOEA8kRFb

Data Sharing. https://t.co/9aqbWU7CCS rehashing research parasites #tbicri16

RT @atulbutte: .@RBAltman brings up Research Parasitism! #IamAResearchParasite https://t.co/VbeQd5ofdD #tbicri16

may be a bit late, but agreed: not @nejm's finest moment. https://t.co/qxVZLacsAR

RT @atulbutte: .@RBAltman brings up Research Parasitism! #IamAResearchParasite https://t.co/VbeQd5ofdD #tbicri16

RT @atulbutte: .@RBAltman brings up Research Parasitism! #IamAResearchParasite https://t.co/VbeQd5ofdD #tbicri16

This paper is why it's hard to get people to share data. Ouch https://t.co/oTp163xQTT #tbicri16

RT @atulbutte: .@RBAltman brings up Research Parasitism! #IamAResearchParasite https://t.co/VbeQd5ofdD #tbicri16

.@RBAltman brings up Research Parasitism! #IamAResearchParasite https://t.co/VbeQd5ofdD #tbicri16

NEJM editor describes new generation scientist as 'Research Parasite' https://t.co/GmiGsSdk3i

NEJM https://t.co/OMJ6A8xLqc data sharing

Clash on data sharing: @iscb (https://t.co/2bdsixMxkt) comment on position of @NEJM (https://t.co/c0s8rbz30O) @ODIHQ

RT @jcdrg: https://t.co/snCjq4b8zJ According to NEJM, sharing data could lead people to disprove other people's research (sic). Science as …

https://t.co/snCjq4b8zJ According to NEJM, sharing data could lead people to disprove other people's research (sic). Science as religion!

RT @StefanKarpinski: https://t.co/ZDguFGfcWi @NEJM #researchparasites https://t.co/50AnRt5eMM

are half of the researchers I know #ResearchParasites, including me. why?bc we do #register based #research https://t.co/vfETEO5Uoi

RT @SBAmin: @Marcia4Science on data sharing & Re: @NEJM https://t.co/V5nzkyzd19 #IAmAResearchParasite https://t.co/6KFkwrAZgy https://t.co/…