RT @brembs: If nobody checked their data, perhaps @nejm would have fewer retractions? #researchparasites target="_blank" href="https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7">https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7 https://t.…
RT @brembs: If nobody checked their data, perhaps @nejm would have fewer retractions? #researchparasites target="_blank" href="https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7">https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7 https://t.…
RT @brembs: If nobody checked their data, perhaps @nejm would have fewer retractions? #researchparasites target="_blank" href="https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7">https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7 https://t.…
RT @brembs: If nobody checked their data, perhaps @nejm would have fewer retractions? #researchparasites target="_blank" href="https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7">https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7 https://t.…
RT @CoyneoftheRealm: .@NEJM wants to protect reputation of authors who publish faulty data interpretations and erroneous conclusions. https…
RT @CoyneoftheRealm: .@NEJM wants to protect reputation of authors who publish faulty data interpretations and erroneous conclusions. https…
RT @silviaberciano: Trying to replicate published findings or test alternative hypotheses? Careful, you may be a #ResearchParasite! https:…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @phylogenomics: Editorial by @nejm is simply deranged https://t.co/WzxpdR4zA8 caling those using published data "research parasites" htt…
RT @CoyneoftheRealm: .@NEJM wants to protect reputation of authors who publish faulty data interpretations and erroneous conclusions. https…
.@NEJM wants to protect reputation of authors who publish faulty data interpretations and erroneous conclusions. https://t.co/3OLwOi9xTM
RT @brembs: If nobody checked their data, perhaps @nejm would have fewer retractions? #researchparasites target="_blank" href="https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7">https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7 https://t.…
RT @brembs: If nobody checked their data, perhaps @nejm would have fewer retractions? #researchparasites target="_blank" href="https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7">https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7 https://t.…
RT @dgmacarthur: The authors of this @NEJM editorial simply aren't fit to run a modern journal: https://t.co/qQYn1fFh0a Disgraceful, regres…
RT @cryptogenomicon: Dear @NEJM editors (https://t.co/UAUCRpU8uH): I'd like to introduce you to the US National Academy of Sciences: https:…
RT @hwc001: Late to this, but NEJM getting a right twitter kicking for this pathetic piece of whining https://t.co/KgTruUTdxK #IAmAResearch…
RT @lbfjrmd: Data Sharing - Research Parasites NEJM https://t.co/xDPlA5yaa8 instead of original research scavengers use #bigdata 4 conclusi…
RT @grapealope: Fascinating discussion of data sharing, science, #opendata, and #researchparasites, following this NEJM article: https://t.…
RT @Helena_LB: Anyone interested in #opendata & #openscience, check out #researchparasites today, originating from this editorial: https://…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @brembs: If nobody checked their data, perhaps @nejm would have fewer retractions? #researchparasites target="_blank" href="https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7">https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7 https://t.…
RT @hwc001: Late to this, but NEJM getting a right twitter kicking for this pathetic piece of whining https://t.co/KgTruUTdxK #IAmAResearch…
RT @brembs: If nobody checked their data, perhaps @nejm would have fewer retractions? #researchparasites target="_blank" href="https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7">https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7 https://t.…
RT @phylogenomics: Editorial by @nejm is simply deranged https://t.co/WzxpdR4zA8 caling those using published data "research parasites" htt…
RT @brembs: If nobody checked their data, perhaps @nejm would have fewer retractions? #researchparasites target="_blank" href="https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7">https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7 https://t.…
RT @dgmacarthur: The authors of this @NEJM editorial simply aren't fit to run a modern journal: https://t.co/qQYn1fFh0a Disgraceful, regres…
RT @brembs: If nobody checked their data, perhaps @nejm would have fewer retractions? #researchparasites target="_blank" href="https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7">https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7 https://t.…
RT @Katiissick: Opposing this article, #opendata benefits pts & health care . #researchparasites concept is ludicrous. https://t.co/E0suY6…
RT @Helena_LB: Anyone interested in #opendata & #openscience, check out #researchparasites today, originating from this editorial: https://…
RT @Katiissick: Opposing this article, #opendata benefits pts & health care . #researchparasites concept is ludicrous. https://t.co/E0suY6…
RT @brembs: If nobody checked their data, perhaps @nejm would have fewer retractions? #researchparasites target="_blank" href="https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7">https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7 https://t.…
Opposing this article, #opendata benefits pts & health care . #researchparasites concept is ludicrous. https://t.co/E0suY6k6yN
RT @cryptogenomicon: Dear @NEJM editors (https://t.co/UAUCRpU8uH): I'd like to introduce you to the US National Academy of Sciences: https:…
RT @phylogenomics: Editorial by @nejm is simply deranged https://t.co/WzxpdR4zA8 caling those using published data "research parasites" htt…
RT @cryptogenomicon: Dear @NEJM editors (https://t.co/UAUCRpU8uH): I'd like to introduce you to the US National Academy of Sciences: https:…
RT @hornistyf: NEJMに出た、データ共有についての論説。公開データをデータ生産者と協力せずに再解析する人を"research parasites"と称すのは、さすがにいかんで。/Data Sharing — NEJM https://t.co/uwvHSLmhDK
RT @CoyneoftheRealm: Arguments against data sharing in @NEJM vacillate from laughable to sleazy. Must read to believe it's in 2016 NEJM ht…
RT @brembs: If nobody checked their data, perhaps @nejm would have fewer retractions? #researchparasites target="_blank" href="https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7">https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7 https://t.…
RT @Helena_LB: Anyone interested in #opendata & #openscience, check out #researchparasites today, originating from this editorial: https://…
RT @brembs: If nobody checked their data, perhaps @nejm would have fewer retractions? #researchparasites target="_blank" href="https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7">https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7 https://t.…
RT @Helena_LB: Anyone interested in #opendata & #openscience, check out #researchparasites today, originating from this editorial: https://…
@iskander what drivel is this? https://t.co/ryWJ60SZpA
RT @RickyPo: Data Sharing — NEJM https://t.co/TgZKKnfdG9 #rickypo
Data Sharing — NEJM https://t.co/TgZKKnfdG9 #rickypo
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
RT @schneiderleonid: #IAmAResearchParasite @NEJM claims in editorial shared data leads to it being stolen by research parasites. No joke ht…
RT @VincentPlagnol: I have rarely seen an editorial as pointless, misguided and cryptic as the latest NEJM on data sharing https://t.co/Qqm…
RT @brembs: If nobody checked their data, perhaps @nejm would have fewer retractions? #researchparasites target="_blank" href="https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7">https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7 https://t.…
RT @traviskorte: NEJM anti-data sharing op-ed: "But what if they use our data to do the scientific method??" https://t.co/mZFrVkZiNo https:…
But also plea for collaboration “@fredtrotter: Both open data and meta analysis slammed in recent @NEJM editorial https://t.co/CvR2wWrySq”
RT @brembs: If nobody checked their data, perhaps @nejm would have fewer retractions? #researchparasites target="_blank" href="https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7">https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7 https://t.…
Since when does re-analyzing and interpreting someone else's large dataset make you a “research parasite?” #NEJM https://t.co/fiLDEYylKN
RT @brembs: If nobody checked their data, perhaps @nejm would have fewer retractions? #researchparasites target="_blank" href="https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7">https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7 https://t.…
.@TheNeuro_MNI tries to go open as @NEJM ... well read yourself https://t.co/ej2LA1HzCN versus https://t.co/fML9nqxx5o #researchparasites
Data Sharing - Research Parasites NEJM https://t.co/xDPlA5yaa8 instead of original research scavengers use #bigdata 4 conclusions. #healthit
RT @NEJM: Two @NEJM editors say data sharing should happen symbiotically, not parasitically. Case in point: new CDX2 study. https://t.co/n8…
RT @JustinWolfers: The New England Journal calls analyzing data that others collected "parasitic" & comes out against data transparency htt…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @brembs: If nobody checked their data, perhaps @nejm would have fewer retractions? #researchparasites target="_blank" href="https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7">https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7 https://t.…
RT @brembs: If nobody checked their data, perhaps @nejm would have fewer retractions? #researchparasites target="_blank" href="https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7">https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7 https://t.…
Data Sharing — NEJM https://t.co/qg7bVwd1kT
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @cryptogenomicon: Dear @NEJM editors (https://t.co/UAUCRpU8uH): I'd like to introduce you to the US National Academy of Sciences: https:…
Wow, very troubling. NEJM comes out against data sharing https://t.co/1qD4z7FLHo
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
From journal that gave us the #Evilfinger_ I mean Ingelfinger Rule Don't share- you might help dying people too fast https://t.co/d6KWfa4NcM
RT @sheacshl: 1) “Research parasites?” Really? This review is absurdly anachronistic and out of touch: https://t.co/98vIqsswCc
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @CoyneoftheRealm: Please bring on the "research parasites." Evidence-based medicine desperately needs them. https://t.co/3OLwOir8Lk http…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @phylogenomics: Editorial by @nejm is simply deranged https://t.co/WzxpdR4zA8 caling those using published data "research parasites" htt…
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
RT @MathCancer: I believe the word you're looking for here is "citation", @NEJM. #IAmAResearchParasite https://t.co/fhLCNlVsfr https://t.c…
"Possibly stealing from [...] research productivity" // Bitch please // ht @BrianNosek // Data Sharing — NEJM https://t.co/4sdQ32bkM8
1) “Research parasites?” Really? This review is absurdly anachronistic and out of touch: https://t.co/98vIqsswCc
RT @phylogenomics: Editorial by @nejm is simply deranged https://t.co/WzxpdR4zA8 caling those using published data "research parasites" htt…
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @JohnPLeonardMD: Term "research parasite" not one I like, and chatter about it obscures some valid points here: Data Sharing @NEJM http…
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
RT @russpoldrack: NEJM editors: either collaborate with "front-line researchers" or you are a "research parasite" https://t.co/SIOThz6c1M …
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
RT @wilbanks: First they ignore, then they laugh, then they attack, then you win. Guess we’re into phase three. #researchparasites https://…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
RT @MathCancer: I believe the word you're looking for here is "citation", @NEJM. #IAmAResearchParasite https://t.co/fhLCNlVsfr https://t.c…
RT @JustinWolfers: The New England Journal calls analyzing data that others collected "parasitic" & comes out against data transparency htt…
RT @ArthurCaplan: Data Sharing — NEJM https://t.co/z051MDAOx3
RT @dgmacarthur: The authors of this @NEJM editorial simply aren't fit to run a modern journal: https://t.co/qQYn1fFh0a Disgraceful, regres…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
Term "research parasite" not one I like, and chatter about it obscures some valid points here: Data Sharing @NEJM https://t.co/HxJRWTgka7
RT @brembs: If nobody checked their data, perhaps @nejm would have fewer retractions? #researchparasites target="_blank" href="https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7">https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7 https://t.…
RT @dgmacarthur: The authors of this @NEJM editorial simply aren't fit to run a modern journal: https://t.co/qQYn1fFh0a Disgraceful, regres…
RT @hornistyf: NEJMに出た、データ共有についての論説。公開データをデータ生産者と協力せずに再解析する人を"research parasites"と称すのは、さすがにいかんで。/Data Sharing — NEJM https://t.co/uwvHSLmhDK
Ultimately, "sharing" data can be expected, but shouldn't be commanded https://t.co/rBoDUqPax3
RT @hornistyf: NEJMに出た、データ共有についての論説。公開データをデータ生産者と協力せずに再解析する人を"research parasites"と称すのは、さすがにいかんで。/Data Sharing — NEJM https://t.co/uwvHSLmhDK