RT @hornistyf: NEJMに出た、データ共有についての論説。公開データをデータ生産者と協力せずに再解析する人を"research parasites"と称すのは、さすがにいかんで。/Data Sharing — NEJM https://t.co/uwvHSLmhDK
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
I guess citations r not enough 4 published data, and eternal co-author 4 generating data. #researchparasite NEJM https://t.co/pGUe6Va5XF
RT @NEJM: Two @NEJM editors say data sharing should happen symbiotically, not parasitically. Case in point: new CDX2 study. https://t.co/n8…
RT @NEJM: Two @NEJM editors say data sharing should happen symbiotically, not parasitically. Case in point: new CDX2 study. https://t.co/n8…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @mbeisen: .@JeffDrazen at @nejm is one of the most shockingly anti-science things ever written https://t.co/CqWWGV8I9V h/t @michaelhoffm…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @brembs: If nobody checked their data, perhaps @nejm would have fewer retractions? #researchparasites target="_blank" href="https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7">https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7 https://t.…
RT @VincentPlagnol: I have rarely seen an editorial as pointless, misguided and cryptic as the latest NEJM on data sharing https://t.co/Qqm…
RT @SandraWoodsMtl: A "research parasite" uses others' #clinicalresearch #data parasitically, not symbiotically https://t.co/aMvtxvUDuj #me…
RT @hornistyf: NEJMに出た、データ共有についての論説。公開データをデータ生産者と協力せずに再解析する人を"research parasites"と称すのは、さすがにいかんで。/Data Sharing — NEJM https://t.co/uwvHSLmhDK
RT @brembs: If nobody checked their data, perhaps @nejm would have fewer retractions? #researchparasites target="_blank" href="https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7">https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7 https://t.…
RT @VincentPlagnol: I have rarely seen an editorial as pointless, misguided and cryptic as the latest NEJM on data sharing https://t.co/Qqm…
Let's skip the 3rd paragraph in #NEJM #DataSharing paper. This way we will better understand what they want to tell. https://t.co/TMPBCohR1a
RT @danlwarren: @NEJM with an editorial on data sharing that is not only misguided, but actually slightly offensive. https://t.co/DMQ893U3…
NEJMに出た、データ共有についての論説。公開データをデータ生産者と協力せずに再解析する人を"research parasites"と称すのは、さすがにいかんで。/Data Sharing — NEJM https://t.co/uwvHSLmhDK
RT @VincentPlagnol: I have rarely seen an editorial as pointless, misguided and cryptic as the latest NEJM on data sharing https://t.co/Qqm…
RT @KordingLab: The New England Journal of Medicine would call many physicists "research parasites" - https://t.co/1RAnwVJhGj - data analys…
A "research parasite" uses others' #clinicalresearch #data parasitically, not symbiotically https://t.co/aMvtxvUDuj #medicine #bioethics
RT @brembs: If nobody checked their data, perhaps @nejm would have fewer retractions? #researchparasites target="_blank" href="https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7">https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7 https://t.…
RT @davidlazer: A data free critique of data sharing in @NEJM https://t.co/Of4aEXeiFZ, pls provide evidence, any evidence, for any of the a…
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
RT @hspter: I bet these authors feel really bad for poor Anil Potti.. so much productivity stolen!! https://t.co/U2uvaKtdEB https://t.co/2c…
RT @JustinWolfers: The New England Journal calls analyzing data that others collected "parasitic" & comes out against data transparency htt…
"If you want to understand why medical research and medical publishing are in such bad shape, look no further... https://t.co/DAHdJnis3T
RT @fredtrotter: Both open data and meta analysis slammed in recent @NEJM editorial https://t.co/0QRFaK3Iwf
RT @phylogenomics: Editorial by @nejm is simply deranged https://t.co/WzxpdR4zA8 caling those using published data "research parasites" htt…
RT @brembs: If nobody checked their data, perhaps @nejm would have fewer retractions? #researchparasites target="_blank" href="https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7">https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7 https://t.…
RT @brembs: If nobody checked their data, perhaps @nejm would have fewer retractions? #researchparasites target="_blank" href="https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7">https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7 https://t.…
RT @CoyneoftheRealm: Arguments against data sharing in @NEJM vacillate from laughable to sleazy. Must read to believe it's in 2016 NEJM ht…
RT @davidlazer: A data free critique of data sharing in @NEJM https://t.co/Of4aEXeiFZ, pls provide evidence, any evidence, for any of the a…
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
RT @dgmacarthur: The authors of this @NEJM editorial simply aren't fit to run a modern journal: https://t.co/qQYn1fFh0a Disgraceful, regres…
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
Editorial in @NEJM "How would data sharing work best? We think it should happen symbiotically, not parasitically" https://t.co/APTOCQ7hVm
RT @Helena_LB: Anyone interested in #opendata & #openscience, check out #researchparasites today, originating from this editorial: https://…
RT @hspter: I bet these authors feel really bad for poor Anil Potti.. so much productivity stolen!! https://t.co/U2uvaKtdEB https://t.co/2c…
RT @JustinWolfers: The New England Journal calls analyzing data that others collected "parasitic" & comes out against data transparency htt…
RT @Helena_LB: Anyone interested in #opendata & #openscience, check out #researchparasites today, originating from this editorial: https://…
Both open data and meta analysis slammed in recent @NEJM editorial https://t.co/0QRFaK3Iwf
RT @jcveritas: A @NEJM editorial says that reusing others' data for new science makes you a "research parasite"? https://t.co/gZ3YQy3bAI #D…
A @NEJM editorial says that reusing others' data for new science makes you a "research parasite"? https://t.co/gZ3YQy3bAI #DataScience
RT @mbeisen: .@JeffDrazen at @nejm is one of the most shockingly anti-science things ever written https://t.co/CqWWGV8I9V h/t @michaelhoffm…
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
RT @hspter: I bet these authors feel really bad for poor Anil Potti.. so much productivity stolen!! https://t.co/U2uvaKtdEB https://t.co/2c…
RT @brembs: If nobody checked their data, perhaps @nejm would have fewer retractions? #researchparasites target="_blank" href="https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7">https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7 https://t.…
RT @brembs: If nobody checked their data, perhaps @nejm would have fewer retractions? #researchparasites target="_blank" href="https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7">https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7 https://t.…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
I bet these authors feel really bad for poor Anil Potti.. so much productivity stolen!! https://t.co/U2uvaKtdEB https://t.co/2cztKfoHZL
RT @DiederichHC: NEJM piece on #datasharing was met with criticism. How do you feel about the use of the phrase #researchparasite? https://…
RT @PerKohler: Arrogansen i veckans NEJM-ledare... https://t.co/45oCKMd4ij
RT @sethsa: @rdpeng would be awesome to hear your thoughts; maybe in next podcast? https://t.co/MiF4NDGKHL #researchparasites https://t.co/…
RT @russpoldrack: NEJM editors: either collaborate with "front-line researchers" or you are a "research parasite" https://t.co/SIOThz6c1M …
RT @JuliuzBeezer: What distinguished science from alchemy? Publication. Yet @NEJM dinosaurs plead for secret data potions https://t.co/PIZi…
RT @nfusi: "[research parasites] even use the data to try to disprove what the original investigators had posited". Whaat? https://t.co/Rtx…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
NEJM piece on #datasharing was met with criticism. How do you feel about the use of the phrase #researchparasite? https://t.co/QmHGJFWrSa
RT @EversJlh: The way to go: Data Sharing — NEJM https://t.co/hiIBuufrMz
RT @brembs: If nobody checked their data, perhaps @nejm would have fewer retractions? #researchparasites target="_blank" href="https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7">https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7 https://t.…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @brembs: If nobody checked their data, perhaps @nejm would have fewer retractions? #researchparasites target="_blank" href="https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7">https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7 https://t.…
RT @phylogenomics: Editorial by @nejm is simply deranged https://t.co/WzxpdR4zA8 caling those using published data "research parasites" htt…
RT @davidlazer: A data free critique of data sharing in @NEJM https://t.co/Of4aEXeiFZ, pls provide evidence, any evidence, for any of the a…
RT @CoyneoftheRealm: Please bring on the "research parasites." Evidence-based medicine desperately needs them. https://t.co/3OLwOir8Lk http…
RT @brembs: If nobody checked their data, perhaps @nejm would have fewer retractions? #researchparasites target="_blank" href="https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7">https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7 https://t.…
A data free critique of data sharing in @NEJM https://t.co/Of4aEXeiFZ, pls provide evidence, any evidence, for any of the assertions
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @RichardLehman1: What's a "research parasite"? @NEJM Someone who critically appraises open data? We need+++ more of these parasites http…
RT @wilbanks: First they ignore, then they laugh, then they attack, then you win. Guess we’re into phase three. #researchparasites https://…
RT @laurencetratt: Oh no! Sharing research data may encourage "parasites" to "try to disprove what the original [authors] had posited" http…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @laurencetratt: Oh no! Sharing research data may encourage "parasites" to "try to disprove what the original [authors] had posited" http…
RT @richarddmorey: The idea of #researchparasites - that analyzing reported data is "parasitic" is small minded https://t.co/mye2SSKety htt…
Oh no! Sharing research data may encourage "parasites" to "try to disprove what the original [authors] had posited" https://t.co/VBpQbxFHva
RT @trishgreenhalgh: First rule of data sharing: work symbiotically, not parasitically. @NEJM @ArthurCaplan https://t.co/t0z76vbLnt
RT @JohnBorghi: Today in sadly unsurprising, an editorial in #NEJM decries #opendata as "data parasitism": https://t.co/iT7YXjEuGs https://…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @wilbanks: First they ignore, then they laugh, then they attack, then you win. Guess we’re into phase three. #researchparasites https://…
The New England Journal of Medicine on Data Sharing https://t.co/3OMDX9kmwD
RT @chrisdc77: How lame. @NEJM attempts to sow fear, uncertainty & doubt into #opendata by calling secondary data users 'parasites' https:/…
RT @brembs: In which @nejm espouses authority and demonizes scrutiny and skepticism: https://t.co/MokdpV6mN8 #researchparasites https://t.c…
RT @mbeisen: .@JeffDrazen at @nejm is one of the most shockingly anti-science things ever written https://t.co/CqWWGV8I9V h/t @michaelhoffm…
RT @CoyneoftheRealm: Please bring on the "research parasites." Evidence-based medicine desperately needs them. https://t.co/3OLwOir8Lk http…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: First rule of data sharing: work symbiotically, not parasitically. @NEJM @ArthurCaplan https://t.co/t0z76vbLnt
@NEJM with an editorial on data sharing that is not only misguided, but actually slightly offensive. https://t.co/DMQ893U3gj
RT @mbeisen: .@JeffDrazen at @nejm is one of the most shockingly anti-science things ever written https://t.co/CqWWGV8I9V h/t @michaelhoffm…
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
RT @johnmyleswhite: If you haven't seen it yet, don't forget to read this NEJM editorial on data sharing: https://t.co/5JFO7kC2Id
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @dgmacarthur: The authors of this @NEJM editorial simply aren't fit to run a modern journal: https://t.co/qQYn1fFh0a Disgraceful, regres…
RT @sethsa: @rdpeng would be awesome to hear your thoughts; maybe in next podcast? https://t.co/MiF4NDGKHL #researchparasites https://t.co/…
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
RT @CoyneoftheRealm: Please bring on the "research parasites." Evidence-based medicine desperately needs them. https://t.co/3OLwOir8Lk http…
RT @mbeisen: .@JeffDrazen at @nejm is one of the most shockingly anti-science things ever written https://t.co/CqWWGV8I9V h/t @michaelhoffm…