RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
RT @BioMickWatson: The @NEJM piece on data ownership is hideous, but are folk really surprised? https://t.co/zJtfUt0KLl
RT @JohnBorghi: Today in sadly unsurprising, an editorial in #NEJM decries #opendata as "data parasitism": https://t.co/iT7YXjEuGs https://…
RT @Malarky67: FFS NEJM. Using your data to refute your hypothesis= parasitism? Popper is spinning in his grave #researchparasites https:/…
RT @brembs: In which @nejm espouses authority and demonizes scrutiny and skepticism: https://t.co/MokdpV6mN8 #researchparasites https://t.c…
RT @brembs: Retraction-record @nejm finds "original investigators" are infallible #researchparasites https://t.co/MokdpV6mN8 https://t.co/K…
Misguided NEJM editorial https://t.co/OKyHIU4xA1 —> #IAmAResearchParasite. Only OK to stand on giants’ shoulders if U make them coauthors?
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
RT @JustinWolfers: The New England Journal calls analyzing data that others collected "parasitic" & comes out against data transparency htt…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @JustinWolfers: The New England Journal calls analyzing data that others collected "parasitic" & comes out against data transparency htt…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @MathCancer: I believe the word you're looking for here is "citation", @NEJM. #IAmAResearchParasite https://t.co/fhLCNlVsfr https://t.c…
Today in sadly unsurprising, an editorial in #NEJM decries #opendata as "data parasitism": https://t.co/iT7YXjEuGs https://t.co/Syc2yoMZMO
RT @JustinWolfers: The New England Journal calls analyzing data that others collected "parasitic" & comes out against data transparency htt…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @JustinWolfers: The New England Journal calls analyzing data that others collected "parasitic" & comes out against data transparency htt…
RT @JustinWolfers: The New England Journal calls analyzing data that others collected "parasitic" & comes out against data transparency htt…
RT @omgItsEnRIz: https://t.co/IRn6Ojzfl4 Dear authors of this piece of crap: Do you even science? #IAmAResearchParasite
RT @omgItsEnRIz: https://t.co/IRn6Ojzfl4 Dear authors of this piece of crap: Do you even science? #IAmAResearchParasite
RT @omgItsEnRIz: https://t.co/IRn6Ojzfl4 Dear authors of this piece of crap: Do you even science? #IAmAResearchParasite
RT @dgmacarthur: The authors of this @NEJM editorial simply aren't fit to run a modern journal: https://t.co/qQYn1fFh0a Disgraceful, regres…
https://t.co/IRn6Ojzfl4 Dear authors of this piece of crap: Do you even science? #IAmAResearchParasite
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
RT @russpoldrack: NEJM editors: either collaborate with "front-line researchers" or you are a "research parasite" https://t.co/SIOThz6c1M …
RT @HKhiabanian: The insecurity of some "front-line researchers" against "research parasites!" The audacity of doing science! https://t.co/…
RT @CoyneoftheRealm: Please bring on the "research parasites." Evidence-based medicine desperately needs them. https://t.co/3OLwOir8Lk http…
RT @russpoldrack: NEJM editors: either collaborate with "front-line researchers" or you are a "research parasite" https://t.co/SIOThz6c1M …
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
Really bizarre editorial against data sharing. Points: 1) Might be hard; 2) Might prove original authors wrong. Huh?https://t.co/XMCwVK9AA3
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @rymcbr: This is the NEJM piece that has open science tweeps totally ripped https://t.co/N7S9FQjc8D #dataparasites
NEJM editorial posits that reusing others' data for new science makes you a "research parasite" 😕 https://t.co/7g2vU9NmYE (h/t @bengoldacre)
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @dgmacarthur: The authors of this @NEJM editorial simply aren't fit to run a modern journal: https://t.co/qQYn1fFh0a Disgraceful, regres…
RT @erlichya: If you want to throw up a little bit in the mouth, read this @NEJM editorial. https://t.co/hNxDXjhr0R "parasite researchers"
the potential downside of data sharing in research? #researchparasites #datasharing @NEJM https://t.co/TwULs0Z3uT
RT @FrontiersIn: Controversial @NEJM editorial. Are researchers who reuse data without cooperating w/ original authors "parasites"? https:/…
RT @FrontiersIn: Controversial @NEJM editorial. Are researchers who reuse data without cooperating w/ original authors "parasites"? https:/…
RT @brembs: Retraction-record @nejm finds "original investigators" are infallible #researchparasites https://t.co/MokdpV6mN8 https://t.co/K…
RT @JustinWolfers: The New England Journal calls analyzing data that others collected "parasitic" & comes out against data transparency htt…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @mbeisen: .@JeffDrazen at @nejm is one of the most shockingly anti-science things ever written https://t.co/CqWWGV8I9V h/t @michaelhoffm…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
RT @Protohedgehog: So apparently those who re-use research are “research parasites.” Terrible NEJM editorial.. https://t.co/o2vKPaKlRQ #IAm…
So apparently those who re-use research are “research parasites.” Terrible NEJM editorial.. https://t.co/o2vKPaKlRQ #IAmAResearchParasite
RT @dgmacarthur: The authors of this @NEJM editorial simply aren't fit to run a modern journal: https://t.co/qQYn1fFh0a Disgraceful, regres…
RT @MikeTaylor: Appalling @NEJM editorial on data-sharing is stuck in the dark ages, ruled by fear, self-interest. So disappointing. https:…
RT @dgmacarthur: The authors of this @NEJM editorial simply aren't fit to run a modern journal: https://t.co/qQYn1fFh0a Disgraceful, regres…
RT @dgmacarthur: The authors of this @NEJM editorial simply aren't fit to run a modern journal: https://t.co/qQYn1fFh0a Disgraceful, regres…
Data Sharing — NEJM https://t.co/ZOD6Xwt1Im
RT @CoyneoftheRealm: Arguments against data sharing in @NEJM vacillate from laughable to sleazy. Must read to believe it's in 2016 NEJM ht…
Appalling @NEJM editorial on data-sharing is stuck in the dark ages, ruled by fear, self-interest. So disappointing. https://t.co/QCWfG6By8m
RT @JustinWolfers: The New England Journal calls analyzing data that others collected "parasitic" & comes out against data transparency htt…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @mihotep: Tax-funded #PublicHealth "researchers" raise alarm others may re-analyze their data & reach the correct conclusion https://t.c…
A steep hill to climb for #openscience & #opendata if this @NEJM editorial reflects wider views. #researchparasites https://t.co/63JP904Dvp
Controversial @NEJM editorial. Are researchers who reuse data without cooperating w/ original authors "parasites"? https://t.co/DhsHbGzvwr
From my facebook: Sometimes you see a publication so WICKED that you can feel the landscape shift in a negative way. https://t.co/0EF12AeUNR
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
RT @JustinWolfers: The New England Journal calls analyzing data that others collected "parasitic" & comes out against data transparency htt…
Our lab proudly use #opendata to generate & confirm hypotheses and challenge existing beliefs #IAmAResearchParasite https://t.co/MoBNmruaop
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @JustinWolfers: The New England Journal calls analyzing data that others collected "parasitic" & comes out against data transparency htt…
RT @BerndPulverer: old school: some medics favour protectionism ('data parasitation avoidance') over data sharing (https://t.co/mtKgExV93T …
RT @dgmacarthur: The authors of this @NEJM editorial simply aren't fit to run a modern journal: https://t.co/qQYn1fFh0a Disgraceful, regres…
RT @richarddmorey: The idea of #researchparasites - that analyzing reported data is "parasitic" is small minded https://t.co/mye2SSKety htt…
RT @dannykay68: EXTRAORDINARY: NEJM editorial describing those who publish work using open research data as 'parasites' https://t.co/mbElYH…
Editorial on data sharing in @NEJM. How would the principles of #reproduciblescience fit in? https://t.co/GDodyCLHtn #scienceparasites
#ResearchParasites or #ResearchSuperHeroes? The who, how and why of #BigData in health research. https://t.co/uvYr1p7aAi @NEJM
The hash #IAmAResearchParasite is a reaction to an editorial (https://t.co/0qajV0OORE). It's arguing 'about' #OpenData, #DataSharing | nxt.
RT @Helena_LB: Anyone interested in #opendata & #openscience, check out #researchparasites today, originating from this editorial: https://…
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
RT @Helena_LB: Anyone interested in #opendata & #openscience, check out #researchparasites today, originating from this editorial: https://…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @BerndPulverer: old school: some medics favour protectionism ('data parasitation avoidance') over data sharing (https://t.co/mtKgExV93T …
RT @Helena_LB: Anyone interested in #opendata & #openscience, check out #researchparasites today, originating from this editorial: https://…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @russpoldrack: NEJM editors: either collaborate with "front-line researchers" or you are a "research parasite" https://t.co/SIOThz6c1M …
RT @CoyneoftheRealm: Please bring on the "research parasites." Evidence-based medicine desperately needs them. https://t.co/3OLwOir8Lk http…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
old school: some medics favour protectionism ('data parasitation avoidance') over data sharing (https://t.co/mtKgExV93T …) #researchparasite
RT @MMMarksman: If you use others data then you're a "parasite". Wow, can't even fathom how this stinker got to see the light of day https:…
RT @brembs: In which @nejm espouses authority and demonizes scrutiny and skepticism: https://t.co/MokdpV6mN8 #researchparasites https://t.c…
Using my own data to *try* to disprove me? How dare you! #researchparasites https://t.co/voKn8ZfjHr
Oh, my... Data Sharing — NEJM https://t.co/9jV7jVatpo
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @MathCancer: I believe the word you're looking for here is "citation", @NEJM. #IAmAResearchParasite https://t.co/fhLCNlVsfr https://t.c…
@mathbabedotorg The New England Journal of Medicine on data sharing: https://t.co/hAetQtdhHb
RT @schneiderleonid: #IAmAResearchParasite @NEJM claims in editorial shared data leads to it being stolen by research parasites. No joke ht…
RT @CoyneoftheRealm: Please bring on the "research parasites." Evidence-based medicine desperately needs them. https://t.co/3OLwOir8Lk http…
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
RT @CoyneoftheRealm: Arguments against data sharing in @NEJM vacillate from laughable to sleazy. Must read to believe it's in 2016 NEJM ht…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…