Segons aquest article de @NEJM https://t.co/4ZHZPUI4pL #IAmAResearchParasite
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
RT @CoyneoftheRealm: Please bring on the "research parasites." Evidence-based medicine desperately needs them. https://t.co/3OLwOir8Lk http…
RT @ArthurCaplan: Data Sharing — NEJM https://t.co/z051MDAOx3
RT @MathCancer: I believe the word you're looking for here is "citation", @NEJM. #IAmAResearchParasite https://t.co/fhLCNlVsfr https://t.c…
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @fgodlee: See NEJM on data sharing https://t.co/xrzYDvkacm. Are secondary analyses parasitical? What about reproduceability? #IAmAResear…
RT @trished: Editor @nejm : Are those doing secondary analyses of shared data "research parasites"? https://t.co/sVrOlU7WmL -> shared, not …
Thou shalt not steal "from the research productivity planned by the data gatherers" sez NEJM. How long shld we wait? https://t.co/xQvGEk07kG
RT @mbeisen: .@JeffDrazen at @nejm is one of the most shockingly anti-science things ever written https://t.co/CqWWGV8I9V h/t @michaelhoffm…
RT @dgmacarthur: The authors of this @NEJM editorial simply aren't fit to run a modern journal: https://t.co/qQYn1fFh0a Disgraceful, regres…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @dgmacarthur: The authors of this @NEJM editorial simply aren't fit to run a modern journal: https://t.co/qQYn1fFh0a Disgraceful, regres…
Will open data create 'research parasites'? The spectre rasied in an @NEJM editorial https://t.co/og8nDp9afQ
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @MathCancer: I believe the word you're looking for here is "citation", @NEJM. #IAmAResearchParasite https://t.co/fhLCNlVsfr https://t.c…
RT @OpenAccessShef: Anyone interested in data we'd recommend reading this: https://t.co/xLDVIXhstX, and then following the hashtag #IAmARes…
RT @Helena_LB: Anyone interested in #opendata & #openscience, check out #researchparasites today, originating from this editorial: https://…
Having practiced medicine thru many reversals, like Vioxx, I’m trying to understand NEJM take on sharing data. https://t.co/aa1i72nEfZ
Anyone interested in data we'd recommend reading this: https://t.co/xLDVIXhstX, and then following the hashtag #IAmAResearchParasite
RT @NEJM: Two @NEJM editors say data sharing should happen symbiotically, not parasitically. Case in point: new CDX2 study. https://t.co/n8…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @notSoJunkDNA: “parasite researchers” may "use the data to try to disprove what the original investigators had posited” Horror!!! https…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
Data Sharing — NEJM https://t.co/z051MDAOx3
RT @brembs: In which @nejm espouses authority and demonizes scrutiny and skepticism: https://t.co/MokdpV6mN8 #researchparasites https://t.c…
RT @fgodlee: See NEJM on data sharing https://t.co/xrzYDvkacm. Are secondary analyses parasitical? What about reproduceability? #IAmAResear…
EXTRAORDINARY: NEJM editorial describing those who publish work using open research data as 'parasites' https://t.co/mbElYHToXP
RT @JustinWolfers: The New England Journal calls analyzing data that others collected "parasitic" & comes out against data transparency htt…
This is the NEJM piece that has open science tweeps totally ripped https://t.co/N7S9FQjc8D #dataparasites
RT @schneiderleonid: Esteemed @NEJM doctors' message in nutshell: if you want my published data, make me co-author! https://t.co/WIQX4pVnqd…
RT @dgmacarthur: The authors of this @NEJM editorial simply aren't fit to run a modern journal: https://t.co/qQYn1fFh0a Disgraceful, regres…
RT @aylwyn_scally: No actual scientist would use the term research parasite. https://t.co/kh45aNLW2u
RT @brembs: Retraction-record @nejm finds "original investigators" are infallible #researchparasites https://t.co/MokdpV6mN8 https://t.co/K…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @fgodlee: See NEJM on data sharing https://t.co/xrzYDvkacm. Are secondary analyses parasitical? What about reproduceability? #IAmAResear…
RT @dgmacarthur: The authors of this @NEJM editorial simply aren't fit to run a modern journal: https://t.co/qQYn1fFh0a Disgraceful, regres…
RT @brembs: In which @nejm espouses authority and demonizes scrutiny and skepticism: https://t.co/MokdpV6mN8 #researchparasites https://t.c…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @Helena_LB: Anyone interested in #opendata & #openscience, check out #researchparasites today, originating from this editorial: https://…
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
No actual scientist would use the term research parasite. https://t.co/kh45aNLW2u
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
Here's that NEJM article https://t.co/PjUzuOpoaH. What's your view on this? #IAmAResearchParasite
RT @BioMickWatson: The @NEJM piece on data ownership is hideous, but are folk really surprised? https://t.co/zJtfUt0KLl
RT @Helena_LB: Anyone interested in #opendata & #openscience, check out #researchparasites today, originating from this editorial: https://…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @Malarky67: FFS NEJM. Using your data to refute your hypothesis= parasitism? Popper is spinning in his grave #researchparasites https:/…
RT @MathCancer: I believe the word you're looking for here is "citation", @NEJM. #IAmAResearchParasite https://t.co/fhLCNlVsfr https://t.c…
RT @erlichya: If you want to throw up a little bit in the mouth, read this @NEJM editorial. https://t.co/hNxDXjhr0R "parasite researchers"
RT @brembs: In which @nejm espouses authority and demonizes scrutiny and skepticism: https://t.co/MokdpV6mN8 #researchparasites https://t.c…
RT @vgul: To the scientist who is concerned that his open data might be uses to prove him wrong <= That is how science works https://t.co/Q…
RT @dgmacarthur: The authors of this @NEJM editorial simply aren't fit to run a modern journal: https://t.co/qQYn1fFh0a Disgraceful, regres…
RT @brembs: In which @nejm espouses authority and demonizes scrutiny and skepticism: https://t.co/MokdpV6mN8 #researchparasites https://t.c…
RT @CoyneoftheRealm: Please bring on the "research parasites." Evidence-based medicine desperately needs them. https://t.co/3OLwOir8Lk http…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @CoyneoftheRealm: Arguments against data sharing in @NEJM vacillate from laughable to sleazy. Must read to believe it's in 2016 NEJM ht…
RT @BioMickWatson: The @NEJM piece on data ownership is hideous, but are folk really surprised? https://t.co/zJtfUt0KLl
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @JustinWolfers: The New England Journal calls analyzing data that others collected "parasitic" & comes out against data transparency htt…
RT @brembs: Retraction-record @nejm finds "original investigators" are infallible #researchparasites https://t.co/MokdpV6mN8 https://t.co/K…
RT @JustinWolfers: The New England Journal calls analyzing data that others collected "parasitic" & comes out against data transparency htt…
RT @brembs: Retraction-record @nejm finds "original investigators" are infallible #researchparasites https://t.co/MokdpV6mN8 https://t.co/K…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
RT @BioMickWatson: The @NEJM piece on data ownership is hideous, but are folk really surprised? https://t.co/zJtfUt0KLl
RT @mbeisen: .@JeffDrazen at @nejm is one of the most shockingly anti-science things ever written https://t.co/CqWWGV8I9V h/t @michaelhoffm…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @fgodlee: See NEJM on data sharing https://t.co/xrzYDvkacm. Are secondary analyses parasitical? What about reproduceability? #IAmAResear…
RT @JustinWolfers: The New England Journal calls analyzing data that others collected "parasitic" & comes out against data transparency htt…
The New England Journal calls analyzing data that others collected "parasitic" & comes out against data transparency https://t.co/SnGTXOGuJc
RT @schneiderleonid: #IAmAResearchParasite @NEJM claims in editorial shared data leads to it being stolen by research parasites. No joke ht…
Trying to replicate or challenge the conclusions of a published paper? You might well be a "research parasite" -> https://t.co/MC2D0aE0yi
RT @fgodlee: See NEJM on data sharing https://t.co/xrzYDvkacm. Are secondary analyses parasitical? What about reproduceability? #IAmAResear…
RT @wilbanks: First they ignore, then they laugh, then they attack, then you win. Guess we’re into phase three. #researchparasites https://…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @fgodlee: See NEJM on data sharing https://t.co/xrzYDvkacm. Are secondary analyses parasitical? What about reproduceability? #IAmAResear…
Here's the editorial that started this discussion: https://t.co/m67OEp0Z3e #IAmAResearchParasite
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
See NEJM on data sharing https://t.co/xrzYDvkacm. Are secondary analyses parasitical? What about reproduceability? #IAmAResearchParasite
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @tpscho: Oh no, imagine #researchparasites using "the data to try to disprove what the original investigators had posited." https://t.c…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…