@MikeBradburn2 However... This is not a problem restricted to "data parasites"(https://t.co/frrN5a4iaQ). Many researchers seem not to understand (or to simply ignore) their own choices of parameters, data collection & analysis when reporting their fin
@MikeBradburn2 However... This is not a problem restricted to "data parasites"(https://t.co/90tMVcrQp5). Many researchers seem not to understand (or to simply ignore) their own choices of parameters, data collection & analysis when reporting their fin
RT @pomyers: @DVervoort94 @NEJM It's all in their data sharing policy, which their editor described in detail (naming a new class of resear…
@DVervoort94 @NEJM It's all in their data sharing policy, which their editor described in detail (naming a new class of researchers: "research parasites", https://t.co/Q1Hxogufau), prompting a later clarification. Hopefully the new @NEJM editor will requi
RT @ericbenchimol: This editorial in @NEJM appears to argue against the idea of #OpenData, arguing that those replicating research with ava…
The idea of #OpenData presented in this editorial is really a collaboration of two groups with a vested interest in publishing their results, not an independent assessment of the veracity of the research! https://t.co/vuTHIK8rhX
This editorial in @NEJM appears to argue against the idea of #OpenData, arguing that those replicating research with available data are "research parasites" - WOW! I couldn't disagree more. https://t.co/vuTHIK8rhX
@BioMickWatson @PatSchloss @kristenobacter @surt_lab @robdfinn God forbid we play into the argument of Drazen: https://t.co/fHo26YwOja
@BioMickWatson @HarmitMalik Ahhh, I generate data when I need to, but if there is already a well designed study with appropriate samples then I’m proud to be a research parasite! 🦠 https://t.co/uwd20YroI1
@SantiagoSchnell @ruth_baker My thought exactly! Sounds like an implicit territorial protectionism as described vividly in this editorial 👇 https://t.co/rfhfZ6p2Dt
@hydrogo89 @fkratzert @LukGudmundsson @NCAR_Science @G_Thirel @Hydro_research @GionataGhiggi Maybe people are afraid of "research parasites" in hydrology too? ;) ( https://t.co/oN1Mtvq86L ) Sometimes people can strange in this ways : / https://t.co/cnc
RT @JavierHerrero7: .@GreeneScientist — After the controversy on ‘research parasites’ (see https://t.co/aBGwIlZAS5 and https://t.co/57AsQAW…
RT @JavierHerrero7: .@GreeneScientist — After the controversy on ‘research parasites’ (see https://t.co/aBGwIlZAS5 and https://t.co/57AsQAW…
RT @JavierHerrero7: .@GreeneScientist — After the controversy on ‘research parasites’ (see https://t.co/aBGwIlZAS5 and https://t.co/57AsQAW…
RT @JavierHerrero7: .@GreeneScientist — After the controversy on ‘research parasites’ (see https://t.co/aBGwIlZAS5 and https://t.co/57AsQAW…
RT @JavierHerrero7: .@GreeneScientist — After the controversy on ‘research parasites’ (see https://t.co/aBGwIlZAS5 and https://t.co/57AsQAW…
RT @JavierHerrero7: .@GreeneScientist — After the controversy on ‘research parasites’ (see https://t.co/aBGwIlZAS5 and https://t.co/57AsQAW…
RT @JavierHerrero7: .@GreeneScientist — After the controversy on ‘research parasites’ (see https://t.co/aBGwIlZAS5 and https://t.co/57AsQAW…
RT @JavierHerrero7: .@GreeneScientist — After the controversy on ‘research parasites’ (see https://t.co/aBGwIlZAS5 and https://t.co/57AsQAW…
RT @JavierHerrero7: .@GreeneScientist — After the controversy on ‘research parasites’ (see https://t.co/aBGwIlZAS5 and https://t.co/57AsQAW…
RT @JavierHerrero7: .@GreeneScientist — After the controversy on ‘research parasites’ (see https://t.co/aBGwIlZAS5 and https://t.co/57AsQAW…
RT @JavierHerrero7: .@GreeneScientist — After the controversy on ‘research parasites’ (see https://t.co/aBGwIlZAS5 and https://t.co/57AsQAW…
RT @JavierHerrero7: .@GreeneScientist — After the controversy on ‘research parasites’ (see https://t.co/aBGwIlZAS5 and https://t.co/57AsQAW…
RT @JavierHerrero7: .@GreeneScientist — After the controversy on ‘research parasites’ (see https://t.co/aBGwIlZAS5 and https://t.co/57AsQAW…
RT @JavierHerrero7: .@GreeneScientist — After the controversy on ‘research parasites’ (see https://t.co/aBGwIlZAS5 and https://t.co/57AsQAW…
.@GreeneScientist — After the controversy on ‘research parasites’ (see https://t.co/aBGwIlZAS5 and https://t.co/57AsQAWCvj), new awards for researchers re-using data at https://t.co/0UTHhiIG77. Deadline approaching fast (30 Sep) #gi2018
RT @CT_Bergstrom: A few years ago I was pulled into the #ResearchParasites debate set off by the Longo and Drazen @nejm piece https://t.co/…
RT @CT_Bergstrom: A few years ago I was pulled into the #ResearchParasites debate set off by the Longo and Drazen @nejm piece https://t.co/…
RT @CT_Bergstrom: A few years ago I was pulled into the #ResearchParasites debate set off by the Longo and Drazen @nejm piece https://t.co/…
RT @CT_Bergstrom: A few years ago I was pulled into the #ResearchParasites debate set off by the Longo and Drazen @nejm piece https://t.co/…
RT @CT_Bergstrom: A few years ago I was pulled into the #ResearchParasites debate set off by the Longo and Drazen @nejm piece https://t.co/…
RT @CT_Bergstrom: A few years ago I was pulled into the #ResearchParasites debate set off by the Longo and Drazen @nejm piece https://t.co/…
RT @CT_Bergstrom: A few years ago I was pulled into the #ResearchParasites debate set off by the Longo and Drazen @nejm piece https://t.co/…
RT @CT_Bergstrom: A few years ago I was pulled into the #ResearchParasites debate set off by the Longo and Drazen @nejm piece https://t.co/…
Thread on science incentives and consequences. https://t.co/P4YrXcMDua
This issue also applies to biodiversity data and natural history museums. We need "something between citation and authorship" 🤔 https://t.co/bNziVuQ0om
@javabunny16 @hmkyale @YODAProject A bit of an inside-research topic, but it started with this editorial in the New England Journal, in which the research insiders criticized "research parasites" and the idea of sharing clinical trial data with other resea
@Shawpsych I've been educating myself because I wanted to understand what a "research parasite" is.... yeah.. there will be researchers who ONLY use other people's data I suppose and use it badly or with inappropriate assumptions. This is the editorial? ht
Then again, in a way it’s refreshing when people are explicit about their views, as it at least makes you a participant in the debate, like De Longo & Drazen on “research parasites” https://t.co/PuwKMConX5
Artikel in New England Journal of Medicine start discussie over onderzoeksamenwerking: waarom zoveel wetenschappers tegenwoordig die de onderzoeken zelf niet hebben gedaan maar gegevens andermans onderzoeken gebruiken voor publicatie: parasieten? https://t
Esta publicación es una vergüenza https://t.co/AGXbeYaOyE?amp=1
Wow!NEJM editrs actually gave voice 2 position that using publishd data frm taxpayer funded research is #parasitic! https://t.co/9IE6ECTOnJ
The horror! "...even use the data to try to disprove what the original investigators had posited" https://t.co/O0UpsjjC3p
Holy cow! Just heard someone genuinely put forth the "you are a research parasite" position! #researchparasite https://t.co/KsIlCFSwZv
@phylogenomics @zazzle Wait, is this t-shirt talking about bioinformatics? https://t.co/key9zalJ5R
@gail_l_rosen @iddux Well, I think some people see it as a threat to those who generate data. See the sentiments in: https://t.co/pufcqB9hnQ
PARASITE accusation in NEJM editorial ‘Data Sharing’, January 2016 https://t.co/mbElYHToXP #urfistopensci
Apparently analysing published data makes you a "parasite": https://t.co/sAqGQd96ZW @NEJM
Art. 34 de ranking de 100 más consultados es s/ Data Sharing - sugiere que compartir no es tan bueno como parece. https://t.co/qRRG9D8p97
RT @cosnet_bifi: https://t.co/NGQ2n2ltgF: “One of the most shockingly anti-science things ever written.” I agree @mbeisen
RT @cosnet_bifi: https://t.co/NGQ2n2ltgF: “One of the most shockingly anti-science things ever written.” I agree @mbeisen
Research parasites? No, researchers who take advantage of data funded with public money to unveil new evidence... https://t.co/nFvZ2nHEGw
https://t.co/NGQ2n2ltgF: “One of the most shockingly anti-science things ever written.” I agree @mbeisen
RT @moorejh: Here is the original data parasite editorial from @NEJM https://t.co/KvEFItAMuX #PSB17 #datascience #bigdata #opendata
RT @moorejh: Here is the original data parasite editorial from @NEJM https://t.co/KvEFItAMuX #PSB17 #datascience #bigdata #opendata
RT @moorejh: Here is the original data parasite editorial from @NEJM https://t.co/KvEFItAMuX #PSB17 #datascience #bigdata #opendata
RT @moorejh: Here is the original data parasite editorial from @NEJM https://t.co/KvEFItAMuX #PSB17 #datascience #bigdata #opendata
RT @moorejh: Here is the original data parasite editorial from @NEJM https://t.co/KvEFItAMuX #PSB17 #datascience #bigdata #opendata
RT @moorejh: Here is the original data parasite editorial from @NEJM https://t.co/KvEFItAMuX #PSB17 #datascience #bigdata #opendata
Here is the original data parasite editorial from @NEJM https://t.co/KvEFItAMuX #PSB17 #datascience #bigdata #opendata
.@CMichaelGibson points to @NEJM characterization of "research parasites" & the backlash from use of this language https://t.co/l51T2kgPCn https://t.co/3Pk4leitSi
RT @bibliosalut: Data sharing https://t.co/SAp31HWhZV @idispaib https://t.co/yDJlN640gA
RT @bibliosalut: Data sharing https://t.co/SAp31HWhZV @idispaib https://t.co/yDJlN640gA
RT @bibliosalut: Data sharing https://t.co/SAp31HWhZV @idispaib https://t.co/yDJlN640gA
Data sharing https://t.co/SAp31HWhZV @idispaib https://t.co/yDJlN640gA
Data Sharing — NEJM https://t.co/p8DhjP3oKa
.@DrJackKruse @mwelting reproducibility and opportunism isn't a problem just for PhDs. See: https://t.co/eCW25SMFGM
PARASITES: The NEJM editorial on Data Sharing https://t.co/n4cVgNmtLh from Jan 2016 #11mc2016
@NEJM @nih_nhlbi @medstro Taking back the "research parasites" op-ed position? https://t.co/9ZRI01oTBK
RT @biotweeps: here is a link to the infamous editorial in NEJM which started the #researchparasites storm https://t.co/sh7zuymi6n
RT @biotweeps: here is a link to the infamous editorial in NEJM which started the #researchparasites storm https://t.co/sh7zuymi6n
here is a link to the infamous editorial in NEJM which started the #researchparasites storm https://t.co/sh7zuymi6n
Maybe because we want to become #researchsymbiont ’s? Avoiding #researchsaprophyte https://t.co/39YhqTNwWT
@statnews @NEJM @zakkohane Great opportunity. Wonder why it isn't called #researchparasites challenge https://t.co/1YDGeVws4s
Do you think researchers using other ppl's data are #researchparasites? Discuss w/ us at 2 PM @ #WHS2016 #openhealth https://t.co/RNr2DvmoAz https://t.co/GsdebchnDb
Anyone else notice that @NEJM misused the term “symbiont” in their #researchparasite editorial? https://t.co/J7KhlO4DIE
RT @dkernohan: *That* NEJM editorial on open data https://t.co/I5duM9WF8k #jiscrdm
'PARASITES' EDITORIAL: opinion on ‘Data Sharing’ Jan 2016 N Engl J Med https://t.co/g8oH5XHFbq #Jisc
*That* NEJM editorial on open data https://t.co/I5duM9WF8k #jiscrdm
RT @angryhacademic: @TSarampalis @chrisdc77 @NEJM subgroup analysis ok as long as its ur data,otherwise youre a #research parasite #sigh ht…
@TSarampalis @chrisdc77 @NEJM subgroup analysis ok as long as its ur data,otherwise youre a #research parasite #sigh https://t.co/pTG9MCdbbJ
@leonardocandela thanks, it's in response to the recent NEJM editorial https://t.co/gOg5hO6oEo that led to #researchparasite & @dataparasite
"Potential for leveraging existing results for even more benefit pays appropriate tribute to patients" #Data https://t.co/nCMFo9LaVQ @NEJM
NEJM on data sharing and that new class of research person: the "research parasite". And they've not even met me! https://t.co/6hFARqntqK
@joelgrus @St_Rev ah, here we go. https://t.co/k5Yw8C4sps https://t.co/jcQ540m6TK
RT @dannykay68: TURNAROUND: NEJM article re fairness in data sharing https://t.co/RpN5ou38rx big shift from 'parasite' editorial https://t.…
TURNAROUND: NEJM article re fairness in data sharing https://t.co/RpN5ou38rx big shift from 'parasite' editorial https://t.co/g8oH5XHFbq
@keithgeraghty "research parasites" https://t.co/J0f0pu2HHj
@CyrilPedia This one was from the editor in chief. https://t.co/uo7reBjsd8
Sequel to: https://t.co/8jzaJS2VcI ; cc @dataparasite https://t.co/MXaI7fn8S6
Data Sharing — NEJM Nonsense. https://t.co/LFzYkoKxvU #IAmAResearchParasite
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
Data Sharing = “research parasites”?https://t.co/K2E9IT7MFJ
Data Sharing — NEJM https://t.co/P6PU0F67Rz
RT @phylogenomics: Editorial by @nejm is simply deranged https://t.co/WzxpdR4zA8 caling those using published data "research parasites" htt…
Rendre les données des 'biobanks' publiques? Bonne ou mauvaise idée? matière à débat. https://t.co/S0hFHL7Y31 @IRIC_umontreal @ChuSteJustine
RT @fgodlee: See NEJM on data sharing https://t.co/xrzYDvkacm. Are secondary analyses parasitical? What about reproduceability? #IAmAResear…
RT @jcdrg: https://t.co/snCjq4b8zJ According to NEJM, sharing data could lead people to disprove other people's research (sic). Science as…
Data sharing: "a new class of research person will emerge", ie research parasite. Am I missing something? https://t.co/GP90bPg2yX