RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
Data Sharing — NEJM / spoiler: this dude is not a fan https://t.co/d3y1uKtO7V
RT @phylogenomics: Editorial by @nejm is simply deranged https://t.co/WzxpdR4zA8 caling those using published data "research parasites" htt…
RT @phylogenomics: Editorial by @nejm is simply deranged https://t.co/WzxpdR4zA8 caling those using published data "research parasites" htt…
RT @erlichya: If you want to throw up a little bit in the mouth, read this @NEJM editorial. https://t.co/hNxDXjhr0R "parasite researchers"
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
RT @erlichya: If you want to throw up a little bit in the mouth, read this @NEJM editorial. https://t.co/hNxDXjhr0R "parasite researchers"
RT @phylogenomics: Editorial by @nejm is simply deranged https://t.co/WzxpdR4zA8 caling those using published data "research parasites" htt…
RT @erlichya: If you want to throw up a little bit in the mouth, read this @NEJM editorial. https://t.co/hNxDXjhr0R "parasite researchers"
RT @phylogenomics: Editorial by @nejm is simply deranged https://t.co/WzxpdR4zA8 caling those using published data "research parasites" htt…
Terrible commentary from NEMJ about "parasitic researchers" using published data #opendata #cancerresearch https://t.co/UTQkVZWQIl
RT @phylogenomics: Editorial by @nejm is simply deranged https://t.co/WzxpdR4zA8 caling those using published data "research parasites" htt…
RT @phylogenomics: Editorial by @nejm is simply deranged https://t.co/WzxpdR4zA8 caling those using published data "research parasites" htt…
RT @mbeisen: .@JeffDrazen at @nejm is one of the most shockingly anti-science things ever written https://t.co/CqWWGV8I9V h/t @michaelhoffm…
RT @phylogenomics: Editorial by @nejm is simply deranged https://t.co/WzxpdR4zA8 caling those using published data "research parasites" htt…
RT @phylogenomics: Editorial by @nejm is simply deranged https://t.co/WzxpdR4zA8 caling those using published data "research parasites" htt…
RT @mbeisen: .@JeffDrazen at @nejm is one of the most shockingly anti-science things ever written https://t.co/CqWWGV8I9V h/t @michaelhoffm…
Editorial by @nejm is simply deranged https://t.co/WzxpdR4zA8 caling those using published data "research parasites" https://t.co/SjyoExNHQG
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
Huh? co-author of above proposal @JeffDrazen of @NEJM just called people who use others' data, "research parasites" https://t.co/dzX2eCHqPl
These opinions are extremely bad https://t.co/pqIWI4pZdo
RT @erlichya: If you want to throw up a little bit in the mouth, read this @NEJM editorial. https://t.co/hNxDXjhr0R "parasite researchers"
RT @mbeisen: .@JeffDrazen at @nejm is one of the most shockingly anti-science things ever written https://t.co/CqWWGV8I9V h/t @michaelhoffm…
RT @erlichya: If you want to throw up a little bit in the mouth, read this @NEJM editorial. https://t.co/hNxDXjhr0R "parasite researchers"
RT @mbeisen: .@JeffDrazen at @nejm is one of the most shockingly anti-science things ever written https://t.co/CqWWGV8I9V h/t @michaelhoffm…
RT @MichelleNMeyer: Struck how similar arguments against trial data sharing https://t.co/6iEYicwuhR are 2those agnst soc sci replication ht…
RT @erlichya: If you want to throw up a little bit in the mouth, read this @NEJM editorial. https://t.co/hNxDXjhr0R "parasite researchers"
RT @mbeisen: .@JeffDrazen at @nejm is one of the most shockingly anti-science things ever written https://t.co/CqWWGV8I9V h/t @michaelhoffm…
RT @mbeisen: .@JeffDrazen at @nejm is one of the most shockingly anti-science things ever written https://t.co/CqWWGV8I9V h/t @michaelhoffm…
RT @mbeisen: .@JeffDrazen at @nejm is one of the most shockingly anti-science things ever written https://t.co/CqWWGV8I9V h/t @michaelhoffm…
RT @mbeisen: .@JeffDrazen at @nejm is one of the most shockingly anti-science things ever written https://t.co/CqWWGV8I9V h/t @michaelhoffm…
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
Concern resrch syst will be taken over by what some resrchers have characterized as “research parasites” https://t.co/WUoYepWcv6 via @NEJM
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
RT @notSoJunkDNA: “parasite researchers” may "use the data to try to disprove what the original investigators had posited” Horror!!! https…
A misunderstanding of both data sharing and parasitism. https://t.co/UXAHhXO4iZ MT @michaelhoffman
RT @notSoJunkDNA: I don’t expect anybody on Twitter to agree with the @NEJM editorial. But do some people really believe this crap? https:/…
RT @mbeisen: .@JeffDrazen at @nejm is one of the most shockingly anti-science things ever written https://t.co/CqWWGV8I9V h/t @michaelhoffm…
RT @notSoJunkDNA: “parasite researchers” may "use the data to try to disprove what the original investigators had posited” Horror!!! https…
RT @notSoJunkDNA: “parasite researchers” may "use the data to try to disprove what the original investigators had posited” Horror!!! https…
.@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https://t.co/HMP2jeA2B2
RT @notSoJunkDNA: “parasite researchers” may "use the data to try to disprove what the original investigators had posited” Horror!!! https…
RT @erlichya: If you want to throw up a little bit in the mouth, read this @NEJM editorial. https://t.co/hNxDXjhr0R "parasite researchers"
RT @mbeisen: .@JeffDrazen at @nejm is one of the most shockingly anti-science things ever written https://t.co/CqWWGV8I9V h/t @michaelhoffm…
RT @MichelleNMeyer: Struck how similar arguments against trial data sharing https://t.co/6iEYicwuhR are 2those agnst soc sci replication ht…
The insecurity of some "front-line researchers" against "research parasites!" The audacity of doing science! https://t.co/lkgra7oCHf
The insecurity of some "front-line researchers" against "research parasites!" The audacity of doing science! https://t.co/lkgra7oCHf …
RT @mbeisen: .@JeffDrazen at @nejm is one of the most shockingly anti-science things ever written https://t.co/CqWWGV8I9V h/t @michaelhoffm…
“parasite researchers” may "use the data to try to disprove what the original investigators had posited” Horror!!! https://t.co/ynOA6wVRWI
RT @erlichya: If you want to throw up a little bit in the mouth, read this @NEJM editorial. https://t.co/hNxDXjhr0R "parasite researchers"
RT @MichelleNMeyer: Struck how similar arguments against trial data sharing https://t.co/6iEYicwuhR are 2those agnst soc sci replication ht…
RT @erlichya: If you want to throw up a little bit in the mouth, read this @NEJM editorial. https://t.co/hNxDXjhr0R "parasite researchers"
RT @erlichya: If you want to throw up a little bit in the mouth, read this @NEJM editorial. https://t.co/hNxDXjhr0R "parasite researchers"
RT @mbeisen: .@JeffDrazen at @nejm is one of the most shockingly anti-science things ever written https://t.co/CqWWGV8I9V h/t @michaelhoffm…
If you want to throw up a little bit in the mouth, read this @NEJM editorial. https://t.co/hNxDXjhr0R "parasite researchers"
I don’t expect anybody on Twitter to agree with the @NEJM editorial. But do some people really believe this crap? https://t.co/ynOA6wVRWI
Longo/Drazen:optimal if data generators & downstream users work via collaboration, authorship. ? optimal for society https://t.co/SERb9OpWMS
Struck how similar arguments against trial data sharing https://t.co/6iEYicwuhR are 2those agnst soc sci replication https://t.co/mvqtYWGEYI
RT @mbeisen: .@JeffDrazen at @nejm is one of the most shockingly anti-science things ever written https://t.co/CqWWGV8I9V h/t @michaelhoffm…
@NEJM "data stealing" article. 1st concern: "Others won't understand our data limitations." So....explain them? https://t.co/C75uUZz73q
RT @mbeisen: .@JeffDrazen at @nejm is one of the most shockingly anti-science things ever written https://t.co/CqWWGV8I9V h/t @michaelhoffm…
RT @mbeisen: .@JeffDrazen at @nejm is one of the most shockingly anti-science things ever written https://t.co/CqWWGV8I9V h/t @michaelhoffm…
RT @mbeisen: .@JeffDrazen at @nejm is one of the most shockingly anti-science things ever written https://t.co/CqWWGV8I9V h/t @michaelhoffm…
"How would data sharing work best? We think it should happen symbiotically, not parasitically". @NEJM editorial https://t.co/aAQ3Te0lkA
RT @mbeisen: .@JeffDrazen at @nejm is one of the most shockingly anti-science things ever written https://t.co/CqWWGV8I9V h/t @michaelhoffm…
RT @mbeisen: .@JeffDrazen at @nejm is one of the most shockingly anti-science things ever written https://t.co/CqWWGV8I9V h/t @michaelhoffm…
RT @mbeisen: .@JeffDrazen at @nejm is one of the most shockingly anti-science things ever written https://t.co/CqWWGV8I9V h/t @michaelhoffm…
.@JeffDrazen at @nejm is one of the most shockingly anti-science things ever written https://t.co/CqWWGV8I9V h/t @michaelhoffman
@mbeisen @NEJM https://t.co/97ShNbPRiO Enjoy.
RT @wilbanks: First they ignore, then they laugh, then they attack, then you win. Guess we’re into phase three. #researchparasites https://…
Unidentified "concern held by some" weasel words followed by exhortations from editors not to behave "parasitically" https://t.co/97ShNbPRiO
RT @RichardLehman1: What's a "research parasite"? @NEJM Someone who critically appraises open data? We need+++ more of these parasites http…
RT @NEJM: Two @NEJM editors say data sharing should happen symbiotically, not parasitically. Case in point: new CDX2 study. https://t.co/n8…
RT @wilbanks: First they ignore, then they laugh, then they attack, then you win. Guess we’re into phase three. #researchparasites https://…
RT @wilbanks: First they ignore, then they laugh, then they attack, then you win. Guess we’re into phase three. #researchparasites https://…
Data Sharing. https://t.co/NnucWSNFTY
Cool results from NSABP collab, if true: good for pts, bad for sales https://t.co/zcpygb14Vh https://t.co/CYFSeUzPqd https://t.co/vJqc4aiEcG
Data Sharing — NEJM https://t.co/Y0Pao86Gr0
RT @wilbanks: First they ignore, then they laugh, then they attack, then you win. Guess we’re into phase three. #researchparasites https://…
RT @psethmd: A cautious look at #datasharing as it relates to #clinicaltrials | https://t.co/l7dEsb9fhD @NEJM #bigdata #healthIT #EBM
A cautious look at #datasharing as it relates to #clinicaltrials | https://t.co/l7dEsb9fhD @NEJM #bigdata #healthIT #EBM
Editorial: Data Sharing — NEJM https://t.co/BKEbwgmbyG #Bioethics
Understanding the assumptions of the data & sharing symbiotically rather than parasitically. https://t.co/zuxDsqpNmP @NEJM #healthdata
RT @RichardLehman1: What's a "research parasite"? @NEJM Someone who critically appraises open data? We need+++ more of these parasites http…
Data Sharing [NEJM] https://t.co/tuT7ALlXyp
Data Sharing @NEJM https://t.co/zabGues0Nl #DTHSTR
RT @RichardLehman1: What's a "research parasite"? @NEJM Someone who critically appraises open data? We need+++ more of these parasites http…
RT @RichardLehman1: What's a "research parasite"? @NEJM Someone who critically appraises open data? We need+++ more of these parasites http…
Du bon et du mauvais data Sharing — éditorial un peu sioux : traitement parasite ou symbiotique des data https://t.co/mEIRHjigrQ via @nejm
RT @RichardLehman1: What's a "research parasite"? @NEJM Someone who critically appraises open data? We need+++ more of these parasites http…
What's a "research parasite"? @NEJM Someone who critically appraises open data? We need+++ more of these parasites https://t.co/PJvUoDzROo
RT @Magda_Skipper: Data Sharing — interesting editorial on the issue from the clinical perspective @NEJM https://t.co/Vz6vOefj6K
RT @jsross119: Details of data sharing may be tricky, but nice eg @NEJM of how new ideas, cooperation, extend scientific knowledge https:/…
Details of data sharing may be tricky, but nice eg @NEJM of how new ideas, cooperation, extend scientific knowledge https://t.co/qF2y5aNwa5
Data Sharing — NEJM https://t.co/iqBTEZIe4v
RT @NEJM: Two @NEJM editors say data sharing should happen symbiotically, not parasitically. Case in point: new CDX2 study. https://t.co/n8…
RT @NEJM: Two @NEJM editors say data sharing should happen symbiotically, not parasitically. Case in point: new CDX2 study. https://t.co/n8…
RT @Magda_Skipper: Data Sharing — interesting editorial on the issue from the clinical perspective @NEJM https://t.co/Vz6vOefj6K
RT @Magda_Skipper: Data Sharing — interesting editorial on the issue from the clinical perspective @NEJM https://t.co/Vz6vOefj6K
RT @Magda_Skipper: Data Sharing — interesting editorial on the issue from the clinical perspective @NEJM https://t.co/Vz6vOefj6K