Title |
Data Sharing
|
---|---|
Published in |
New England Journal of Medicine, January 2016
|
DOI | 10.1056/nejme1516564 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Dan L Longo, Jeffrey M Drazen |
Abstract |
The aerial view of the concept of data sharing is beautiful. What could be better than having high-quality information carefully reexamined for the possibility that new nuggets of useful data are lying there, previously unseen? The potential for leveraging existing results for even more benefit pays appropriate increased tribute to the patients who put themselves at risk to generate the data. The moral imperative to honor their collective sacrifice is the trump card that takes this trick. However, many of us who have actually conducted clinical research, managed clinical studies and data collection and analysis, and curated data sets have . . . |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,869 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 498 | 27% |
United Kingdom | 217 | 12% |
Canada | 53 | 3% |
Australia | 45 | 2% |
Spain | 42 | 2% |
Germany | 40 | 2% |
Netherlands | 37 | 2% |
Japan | 36 | 2% |
Sweden | 26 | 1% |
Other | 243 | 13% |
Unknown | 632 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1054 | 56% |
Scientists | 639 | 34% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 101 | 5% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 74 | 4% |
Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 382 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 18 | 5% |
United Kingdom | 6 | 2% |
Germany | 3 | <1% |
Spain | 3 | <1% |
Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
Canada | 2 | <1% |
South Africa | 2 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Other | 6 | 2% |
Unknown | 338 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 110 | 29% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 70 | 18% |
Student > Master | 47 | 12% |
Other | 28 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 27 | 7% |
Other | 110 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 108 | 28% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 64 | 17% |
Computer Science | 45 | 12% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 31 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 30 | 8% |
Other | 91 | 24% |
Unknown | 13 | 3% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1916. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2024.
All research outputs
#5,029
of 25,593,129 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#290
of 32,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42
of 404,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#7
of 366 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,593,129 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,563 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,471 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 366 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.