Data Sharing — NEJM https://t.co/XR4ECc029P
Are data scientists "research parasites"? https://t.co/qpyTMpHiAh
Data Sharing — NEJM https://t.co/PqfITo1Uls
Wrong-headed from the New England Journal of Medicine https://t.co/WljnV3xci0. Folks who reuse data are '“research parasites”...?!
Are data scientist "parasites" because they are not involved in the process of collecting data (or they neglect it)? https://t.co/AkpWrTV3gN
Data sharing and the need to work symbiotically not parasitically https://t.co/bW0t5RmF7W
【データ共有の落とし穴】Data Sharing — NEJM https://t.co/XdoeC2FLHx
Data Sharing — NEJM https://t.co/HgmE4rIpDh
Unfortunately, OA wackaloons, I must side with this widely criticized, but true, NEJM Editorial https://t.co/r1TQlIbZwo
NEJM editorial says those re-analyzing others' data are "research parasites" - whaaaat? https://t.co/pX98QhfTaz
"Data sharing should happen symbiotically, not parasitically..." https://t.co/WLL2CDjniI
Data Sharing https://t.co/cKa7Evr7pv #Biobanking
Data Sharing — NEJM https://t.co/8bJPe1kYT4
Data Sharing — NEJM https://t.co/v1g8p7uwiR Starting to see the fruits of our labors in semantic tech for data sharing. I'm encouraged!
On “research parasites": Data Sharing — NEJM https://t.co/NrWvz6zdmv
Data Sharing (editorial of the NEJM) https://t.co/vnzS8YqkdM