Swing and a miss: NEJM editorial denouncing open access to raw data. #researchparasites https://t.co/3A1f3x20Zo
RT @ontowonka: @force11rescomm blog https://t.co/hO5UJlu31O RE #researchparasites @NEJM https://t.co/tBUDTvuIbr, #Force2016 welcomes resear…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @ontowonka: @force11rescomm blog https://t.co/hO5UJlu31O RE #researchparasites @NEJM https://t.co/tBUDTvuIbr, #Force2016 welcomes resear…
NEJM Editorial on #Data Sharing. https://t.co/hXBhbqQGwy
RT @AllenFrancesMD: For shame NEJM: 1)Praised research colloboration with Pharma; 2)Condemns 'research parasites' reanalyzing open data htt…
RT @AllenFrancesMD: For shame NEJM: 1)Praised research colloboration with Pharma; 2)Condemns 'research parasites' reanalyzing open data htt…
RT @AllenFrancesMD: For shame NEJM: 1)Praised research colloboration with Pharma; 2)Condemns 'research parasites' reanalyzing open data htt…
RT @ontowonka: @force11rescomm blog https://t.co/hO5UJlu31O RE #researchparasites @NEJM https://t.co/tBUDTvuIbr, #Force2016 welcomes resear…
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
RT @ontowonka: @force11rescomm blog https://t.co/hO5UJlu31O RE #researchparasites @NEJM https://t.co/tBUDTvuIbr, #Force2016 welcomes resear…
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
RT @ontowonka: @force11rescomm blog https://t.co/hO5UJlu31O RE #researchparasites @NEJM https://t.co/tBUDTvuIbr, #Force2016 welcomes resear…
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
@force11rescomm blog https://t.co/hO5UJlu31O RE #researchparasites @NEJM https://t.co/tBUDTvuIbr, #Force2016 welcomes research parasitism!
@pajerry it was an ironical remark pointing at ridiculous editorial published by @NEJM recently https://t.co/lFsvwDIWCn
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
@Jayarava @Neuro_Skeptic of course! I was making a joke about the recent @NEJM editorial https://t.co/lFsvwDIWCn
The NEJM work has been done by a number of friends and associates and is critical in semantifying medical journals. https://t.co/UdFVSK9hjV
Nearly all of our medical research is wrong https://t.co/4Kic9E0eKQ meanwhile NEJM opposes open data https://t.co/mdxZtlDCb2 #loligarchy
Jan 21 https://t.co/j2gVrTolqe, NEJM editors only. Jan 28 https://t.co/S2uzNehgkU, NEJM w/ ICMJE. @juliaoftoronto @ivanoransky @armarcus
RT @dgmacarthur: The authors of this @NEJM editorial simply aren't fit to run a modern journal: https://t.co/qQYn1fFh0a Disgraceful, regres…
"Data sharing" Dan L Longon, Jeffrey M Drazen: https://t.co/xS3UaekO4M #data #publishing #science
Here the original editorial https://t.co/MsoOFexHxx and a posterior ammendment... https://t.co/irDsvsyhPs #OA https://t.co/J5TlkcKiaD
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
RT @LucieCBurgess: Potential barrier to data sharing: ‘research parasites’ - https://t.co/S4lTO3JRpz. How widespread is this problem? #lear…
Potential barrier to data sharing: ‘research parasites’ - https://t.co/S4lTO3JRpz. How widespread is this problem? #learnlondon16
This might be the funniest research article I must have read until now. Data Sharing — NEJM https://t.co/qZIgPn25xP
NEJM implies disrespect for data reanalysis then changes its mind https://t.co/FVrSnkW2dd https://t.co/Pcyrh9WGUC #parasitegate #datascience
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
#Datasharing and the rise of the “Research Parasite” – interesting editorial from @NEJM https://t.co/HfLBuACeci
RT @itokouta: 当然、「寄生虫」呼ばわりされた人々はNEJMに激怒。ただ「寄生虫」が増えすぎて、仮に一次研究の担い手が減ってしまったら、彼らが寄生できる一次データすら欠乏してしまう。医療の進歩はそこで停滞してしまうのかもしれない。https://t.co/zExQE…
RT @brembs: If nobody checked their data, perhaps @nejm would have fewer retractions? #researchparasites target="_blank" href="https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7">https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7 https://t.…
RT @itokouta: 当然、「寄生虫」呼ばわりされた人々はNEJMに激怒。ただ「寄生虫」が増えすぎて、仮に一次研究の担い手が減ってしまったら、彼らが寄生できる一次データすら欠乏してしまう。医療の進歩はそこで停滞してしまうのかもしれない。https://t.co/zExQE…
RT @JasonJPitt: Ironically, I suspect most patients would view those who silo publicly funded data as the "research parasites" https://t.co…
.@adityagp Here's the original editorial (from the most prestigious j. in medicine) arguing that data sharing is bad https://t.co/obqDhtjcEP
RT @met_scai: ¿Parásitos de la investigación? https://t.co/JGQ0EIM75b https://t.co/QwcobjKux1
RT @met_scai: ¿Parásitos de la investigación? https://t.co/JGQ0EIM75b https://t.co/QwcobjKux1
RT @gokool4bioinfo: I guess citations r not enough 4 published data, and eternal co-author 4 generating data. #researchparasite NEJM https:…
RT @gokool4bioinfo: I guess citations r not enough 4 published data, and eternal co-author 4 generating data. #researchparasite NEJM https:…
Data Sharing — NEJM https://t.co/XR4ECc029P
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
Are data scientists "research parasites"? https://t.co/qpyTMpHiAh
RT @schneiderleonid: #IAmAResearchParasite @NEJM claims in editorial shared data leads to it being stolen by research parasites. No joke ht…
RT @fgodlee: See NEJM on data sharing https://t.co/xrzYDvkacm. Are secondary analyses parasitical? What about reproduceability? #IAmAResear…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
Data Sharing — NEJM https://t.co/PqfITo1Uls
#OpenScience as synbiotic relation between data gatherers and data analysts https://t.co/hcbRqkAFmE
RT @svoboda314: Wrong-headed from the New England Journal of Medicine https://t.co/WljnV3xci0. Folks who reuse data are '“research parasite…
Wrong-headed from the New England Journal of Medicine https://t.co/WljnV3xci0. Folks who reuse data are '“research parasites”...?!
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
Are data scientist "parasites" because they are not involved in the process of collecting data (or they neglect it)? https://t.co/AkpWrTV3gN
RT @RainuKaushal: EHR data sharing on 70M patients through @PCORI @PCORnetwork challenges unfortunate concept of "research parasite" https:…
EHR data sharing on 70M patients through @PCORI @PCORnetwork challenges unfortunate concept of "research parasite" https://t.co/YCEBDpP9dX
RT @dataparasite: Neat! The vanity link for the NEJM editorial is now: https://t.co/Xp4crHd5dp https://t.co/dOtggMfNHP
Data sharing and the need to work symbiotically not parasitically https://t.co/bW0t5RmF7W
RT @CellTypist: @NEJM calls users of publically available datasets #reserachparasites https://t.co/bjfs53e68K; parasites welcome at https:/…
RT @JasonJPitt: Ironically, I suspect most patients would view those who silo publicly funded data as the "research parasites" https://t.co…
RT @itokouta: 当然、「寄生虫」呼ばわりされた人々はNEJMに激怒。ただ「寄生虫」が増えすぎて、仮に一次研究の担い手が減ってしまったら、彼らが寄生できる一次データすら欠乏してしまう。医療の進歩はそこで停滞してしまうのかもしれない。https://t.co/zExQE…
RT @itokouta: 当然、「寄生虫」呼ばわりされた人々はNEJMに激怒。ただ「寄生虫」が増えすぎて、仮に一次研究の担い手が減ってしまったら、彼らが寄生できる一次データすら欠乏してしまう。医療の進歩はそこで停滞してしまうのかもしれない。https://t.co/zExQE…
RT @jvlilly: "We think it should happen symbiotically, not parasitically." #opendata #openscience #forthekids https://t.co/SO8VIs6Nvz
RT @jvlilly: "We think it should happen symbiotically, not parasitically." #opendata #openscience #forthekids https://t.co/SO8VIs6Nvz
RT @jvlilly: "We think it should happen symbiotically, not parasitically." #opendata #openscience #forthekids https://t.co/SO8VIs6Nvz
【データ共有の落とし穴】Data Sharing — NEJM https://t.co/XdoeC2FLHx
RT @fgodlee: See NEJM on data sharing https://t.co/xrzYDvkacm. Are secondary analyses parasitical? What about reproduceability? #IAmAResear…
RT @JasonJPitt: Ironically, I suspect most patients would view those who silo publicly funded data as the "research parasites" https://t.co…
RT @dataparasite: Neat! The vanity link for the NEJM editorial is now: https://t.co/Xp4crHd5dp https://t.co/dOtggMfNHP
Data Sharing — NEJM https://t.co/HgmE4rIpDh
RT @kidney_boy: The editorial: https://t.co/nmYPAO1n4u And the walk back: https://t.co/Nh1gEyW8O4 #researchparasites
RT @NEJM: Two @NEJM editors say data sharing should happen symbiotically, not parasitically. Case in point: new CDX2 study. https://t.co/n8…
"We think it should happen symbiotically, not parasitically." #opendata #openscience #forthekids https://t.co/SO8VIs6Nvz
#Data Sharing — NEJM https://t.co/zUsoNZQi1U
RT @DrSethdb: Editorial @JeffDrazen @NEJM Cares more about investigators & publishers than seeking truth https://t.co/KPHiU82qD2 https://t.…
Editorial @JeffDrazen @NEJM Cares more about investigators & publishers than seeking truth https://t.co/KPHiU82qD2 https://t.co/boCMoPqeE0
Unfortunately, OA wackaloons, I must side with this widely criticized, but true, NEJM Editorial https://t.co/r1TQlIbZwo
"How would data sharing work best? We think it should happen symbiotically, not parasitically." #datacronyism https://t.co/jDLe69vJvs
RT @orestistsinalis: You want to replicate an experiment. You are a "research parasite". Anti-science editorial via the @NEJM https://t.co/…
You want to replicate an experiment. You are a "research parasite". Anti-science editorial via the @NEJM https://t.co/jDLe69vJvs
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…