RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
Are data scientists parasites, not doing real work to getresearch findings? NEJM things so. https://t.co/WE9FaZS3m2 https://t.co/d6W5340Svd
NEJM editorial says those re-analyzing others' data are "research parasites" - whaaaat? https://t.co/pX98QhfTaz
@celrae @webbmedia @dgmacarthur @NEJM No. Read third paragraph: https://t.co/wFuSSUsEpJ
RT @dgmacarthur: The authors of this @NEJM editorial simply aren't fit to run a modern journal: https://t.co/yfyEQp1YoH Disgraceful.
RT @fgodlee: See NEJM on data sharing https://t.co/xrzYDvkacm. Are secondary analyses parasitical? What about reproduceability? #IAmAResear…
RT @fgodlee: See NEJM on data sharing https://t.co/xrzYDvkacm. Are secondary analyses parasitical? What about reproduceability? #IAmAResear…
Should collaboration really be integral to #Data Sharing? https://t.co/bbjHxvmfm5
@NPRHealth @hmkyale Most journal editors, anyway. The @NEJM is one obvious exception: https://t.co/wFuSSUsEpJ
"Data sharing should happen symbiotically, not parasitically..." https://t.co/WLL2CDjniI
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
Data Sharing https://t.co/cKa7Evr7pv #Biobanking
Neat! The vanity link for the NEJM editorial is now: https://t.co/Xp4crHd5dp https://t.co/dOtggMfNHP
RT @metabrown312: Data Sharing — NEJM https://t.co/8bJPe1kYT4
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @JasonJPitt: Ironically, I suspect most patients would view those who silo publicly funded data as the "research parasites" https://t.co…
Data Sharing — NEJM https://t.co/8bJPe1kYT4
RT @JasonJPitt: Ironically, I suspect most patients would view those who silo publicly funded data as the "research parasites" https://t.co…
RT @JasonJPitt: Ironically, I suspect most patients would view those who silo publicly funded data as the "research parasites" https://t.co…
@JasonJPitt Proud to confirm I'm a "research parasite" as described by @NEJM. As will be anyone using @uk_biobank : https://t.co/PedPXDUISv
RT @JasonJPitt: Ironically, I suspect most patients would view those who silo publicly funded data as the "research parasites" https://t.co…
RT @JasonJPitt: Ironically, I suspect most patients would view those who silo publicly funded data as the "research parasites" https://t.co…
RT @JasonJPitt: Ironically, I suspect most patients would view those who silo publicly funded data as the "research parasites" https://t.co…
RT @hspter: I bet these authors feel really bad for poor Anil Potti.. so much productivity stolen!! https://t.co/U2uvaKtdEB https://t.co/2c…
RT @JasonJPitt: Ironically, I suspect most patients would view those who silo publicly funded data as the "research parasites" https://t.co…
RT @JasonJPitt: Ironically, I suspect most patients would view those who silo publicly funded data as the "research parasites" https://t.co…
RT @JasonJPitt: Ironically, I suspect most patients would view those who silo publicly funded data as the "research parasites" https://t.co…
Data Sharing — NEJM https://t.co/v1g8p7uwiR Starting to see the fruits of our labors in semantic tech for data sharing. I'm encouraged!
Data Sharing. #NEJM https://t.co/SDOesD9fjz
RT @met_scai: ¿Parásitos de la investigación? https://t.co/JGQ0EIM75b https://t.co/QwcobjKux1
RT @Ryan__Schacht: Nice translation of a recent NEJM article https://t.co/nU7IjZEJ1C on #researchparasites https://t.co/iFzSsXSAJp
RT @phylogenomics: Editorial by @nejm is simply deranged https://t.co/WzxpdR4zA8 caling those using published data "research parasites" htt…
RT @kidney_boy: The editorial: https://t.co/nmYPAO1n4u And the walk back: https://t.co/Nh1gEyW8O4 #researchparasites
RT ENDOUNO Data Sharing and #researchparasites: what is the .NEJM defending?#science #research #healthcare https://t.co/l4g18gZou9
Data Sharing and #researchparasites: what is the .@NEJM defending?#science #research #healthcare https://t.co/CGr5LPt0ee
This @NEJM article doesn't make sense. Data sharing may disrupt the academic model, but it will make science better. https://t.co/SDT1RL4OCr
RT @kidney_boy: The editorial: https://t.co/nmYPAO1n4u And the walk back: https://t.co/Nh1gEyW8O4 #researchparasites
EDITORIAL Data Sharing Dan L. Longo, M.D., and Jeffrey M. Drazen, M.D. https://t.co/rbfsRNUjeG #opendata
RT @phylogenomics: Editorial by @nejm is simply deranged https://t.co/WzxpdR4zA8 caling those using published data "research parasites" htt…
RT @MediaREDEF: The New England Journal of Medicine on Data Sharing (Dan L. Longo - @NEJM) https://t.co/eds4sOM78T
The New England Journal of Medicine on Data Sharing (Dan L. Longo - @NEJM) https://t.co/eds4sOM78T
RT @hornistyf: NEJMに出た、データ共有についての論説。公開データをデータ生産者と協力せずに再解析する人を"research parasites"と称すのは、さすがにいかんで。/Data Sharing — NEJM https://t.co/uwvHSLmhDK
RT @JustinWolfers: The New England Journal calls analyzing data that others collected "parasitic" & comes out against data transparency htt…
RT @hornistyf: NEJMに出た、データ共有についての論説。公開データをデータ生産者と協力せずに再解析する人を"research parasites"と称すのは、さすがにいかんで。/Data Sharing — NEJM https://t.co/uwvHSLmhDK
RT @hornistyf: NEJMに出た、データ共有についての論説。公開データをデータ生産者と協力せずに再解析する人を"research parasites"と称すのは、さすがにいかんで。/Data Sharing — NEJM https://t.co/uwvHSLmhDK
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
Nonsense. Concerns over "research parasites" trying "to disprove what the original investigators had posited" https://t.co/C2o8Ya2tA9
RT @JustinWolfers: The New England Journal calls analyzing data that others collected "parasitic" & comes out against data transparency htt…
RT @JustinWolfers: The New England Journal calls analyzing data that others collected "parasitic" & comes out against data transparency htt…
RT @JustinWolfers: The New England Journal calls analyzing data that others collected "parasitic" & comes out against data transparency htt…
RT @JustinWolfers: The New England Journal calls analyzing data that others collected "parasitic" & comes out against data transparency htt…
RT @JasonJPitt: Ironically, I suspect most patients would view those who silo publicly funded data as the "research parasites" https://t.co…
Wonder what data scientists have to say about this :-) https://t.co/SjVhPElUwz
Just me or does this smack of luddism? https://t.co/HfYgvudov5
RT @HistDem: #IAmAResearchParasite. According to the NEJM, everyone who uses #IPUMS should include me as a coauthor. https://t.co/vWhVqYf66H
Hmm. RT @kidney_boy: The editorial: https://t.co/ZfqEjwlgwi And the walk back: https://t.co/nGBipny2dr #researchparasites
@dbroockman better late than never? Is this just because everyone was pissed off at that other NEJM editorial? https://t.co/DF5YSYg9Sf
Data Sharing #NEJM #bigdata #medicine https://t.co/8DskXjriMc
RT @kidney_boy: The editorial: https://t.co/nmYPAO1n4u And the walk back: https://t.co/Nh1gEyW8O4 #researchparasites
RT @met_scai: ¿Parásitos de la investigación? https://t.co/JGQ0EIM75b https://t.co/QwcobjKux1
RT @met_scai: ¿Parásitos de la investigación? https://t.co/JGQ0EIM75b https://t.co/QwcobjKux1
RT @andrewsu: For as much attention #researchparasites has gotten, surprised no @PubMedCommons activity yet https://t.co/5j9pKaVe41
RT @HistDem: #IAmAResearchParasite. According to the NEJM, everyone who uses #IPUMS should include me as a coauthor. https://t.co/vWhVqYf66H
For as much attention #researchparasites has gotten, surprised no @PubMedCommons activity yet https://t.co/5j9pKaVe41
Data Sharing https://t.co/0PuIdRgwDQ #Biobanking
Data Sharing https://t.co/0OvZtCxCW2 #Biobanking
RT @kidney_boy: The editorial: https://t.co/nmYPAO1n4u And the walk back: https://t.co/Nh1gEyW8O4 #researchparasites
Data Sharing — NEJM https://t.co/4wbcnPEVRW
RT @JasonJPitt: Ironically, I suspect most patients would view those who silo publicly funded data as the "research parasites" https://t.co…
Ironically, I suspect most patients would view those who silo publicly funded data as the "research parasites" https://t.co/SM9JghLp4q
Data Sharing https://t.co/Mwpe9KCTvk #Biobanking
Data Sharing https://t.co/4QbemJUXzc #Biobanking
Data Sharing https://t.co/GUXfGU7KYK #Biobanking
RT @ramosdelamedina: Barry Marshall's opinion on sharing data in medical research after controversial editorial. https://t.co/K8JIXUiIYF ht…
Barry Marshall's opinion on sharing data in medical research after controversial editorial. https://t.co/K8JIXUiIYF https://t.co/o1qnubW4a4
¿Parásitos de la investigación? https://t.co/JGQ0EIM75b https://t.co/QwcobjKux1
RT @rschilsky: Another example of the value of biospecimen collection in clinical trials. Data Sharing — NEJM https://t.co/bJQbTiglvE
RT @phylogenomics: Editorial by @nejm is simply deranged https://t.co/WzxpdR4zA8 caling those using published data "research parasites" htt…
RT @kidney_boy: The editorial: https://t.co/nmYPAO1n4u And the walk back: https://t.co/Nh1gEyW8O4 #researchparasites
RT @healthtech: https://t.co/sCYiyQeJKQ symbiosis or parasites.??. free the data should be the universal concept
RT @CientificoenEsp: @CientificoenEsp NEJM: New England Journal of Medicine, IF:55.9 Editorial en disponible en: https://t.co/QrFKyQhHgd
The editorial: https://t.co/nmYPAO1n4u And the walk back: https://t.co/Nh1gEyW8O4 #researchparasites
@CientificoenEsp NEJM: New England Journal of Medicine, IF:55.9 Editorial en disponible en: https://t.co/QrFKyQhHgd
Data Sharing — NEJM; the ethics and potential benefits, https://t.co/1T1n7tnvEE
"Research parasite" or a new type of collaborator: Data Sharing — NEJM https://t.co/i1wRoUzLoN
"Research parasites" - now no need for name calling. NEJM https://t.co/iG5SQGvTWF
RT @ShlomoArgamon: NEJM's "research parasites" are only a threat to second-rate researchers: https://t.co/g3eIIWcl0g #DataScience is #RealS…
RT @mbeisen: .@JeffDrazen at @nejm is one of the most shockingly anti-science things ever written https://t.co/CqWWGV8I9V h/t @michaelhoffm…
NEJM's "research parasites" are only a threat to second-rate researchers: https://t.co/g3eIIWcl0g #DataScience is #RealScience
#BigData, Data Sharing and #Medicine? Read more: https://t.co/2Reii3WqoD via @NEJM #HealthIT
https://t.co/sCYiyQeJKQ symbiosis or parasites.??. free the data should be the universal concept
Doctors like these 2 are clueless...you can tell they dont care if their research benefits society, just themselves: https://t.co/TDW7j70LDk
RT @Protohedgehog: So apparently those who re-use research are “research parasites.” Terrible NEJM editorial.. https://t.co/o2vKPaKlRQ #IAm…
RT @phylogenomics: Editorial by @nejm is simply deranged https://t.co/WzxpdR4zA8 caling those using published data "research parasites" htt…
RT @RichardLehman1: What's a "research parasite"? @NEJM Someone who critically appraises open data? We need+++ more of these parasites http…
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
How would data sharing work best? We think it should happen symbiotically, not parasitically https://t.co/v3WsoHqE96 @alafuente @crendueles