RT @fgodlee: See NEJM on data sharing https://t.co/xrzYDvkacm. Are secondary analyses parasitical? What about reproduceability? #IAmAResear…
RT @russpoldrack: NEJM editors: either collaborate with "front-line researchers" or you are a "research parasite" https://t.co/SIOThz6c1M …
RT @hwc001: Late to this, but NEJM getting a right twitter kicking for this pathetic piece of whining https://t.co/KgTruUTdxK #IAmAResearch…
RT @richarddmorey: The idea of #researchparasites - that analyzing reported data is "parasitic" is small minded https://t.co/mye2SSKety htt…
Data Sharing https://t.co/w7GcXt33XI #Biobanking
RT @MarkkuPeltonen: #Avoin #data voi tuoda mukanaan myös ongelmia. Mahdolliset ongelmat ja haasteet tiedostettava: https://t.co/y14SIiTlCu …
RT @phylogenomics: Editorial by @nejm is simply deranged https://t.co/WzxpdR4zA8 caling those using published data "research parasites" htt…
RT @MathCancer: I believe the word you're looking for here is "citation", @NEJM. #IAmAResearchParasite https://t.co/fhLCNlVsfr https://t.c…
RT @ArsenaultBenoit: Our lab proudly use #opendata to generate & confirm hypotheses and challenge existing beliefs #IAmAResearchParasite ht…
RT @fgodlee: See NEJM on data sharing https://t.co/xrzYDvkacm. Are secondary analyses parasitical? What about reproduceability? #IAmAResear…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @Helena_LB: Anyone interested in #opendata & #openscience, check out #researchparasites today, originating from this editorial: https://…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
Data Sharing https://t.co/wXs8CU1FmQ #Biobanking
RT @hornistyf: NEJMに出た、データ共有についての論説。公開データをデータ生産者と協力せずに再解析する人を"research parasites"と称すのは、さすがにいかんで。/Data Sharing — NEJM https://t.co/uwvHSLmhDK
RT @Tioliah: So nearly everyone in bioinformatics is a parasite? What a ridiculous article from @NEJM https://t.co/wAB8jwASpp #IAmAResear…
RT @ArthurCaplan: Data Sharing — NEJM https://t.co/z051MDAOx3
Not sure if participants and the public who funds research want their data hoarded. Data Sharing — NEJM https://t.co/H3eht59XaK
RT @RetractionWatch: Wait, it's bad if others "use the data to try to disprove what the original investigators had posited," @nejm? https:/…
Different take https://t.co/oYPDxogriN compared to https://t.co/9Z9iJG6yMA. @NatureNews @NEJM @dgmacarthur @skathire @Piwdb @SciTransit
RT @RetractionWatch: Wait, it's bad if others "use the data to try to disprove what the original investigators had posited," @nejm? https:/…
RT @fgodlee: See NEJM on data sharing https://t.co/xrzYDvkacm. Are secondary analyses parasitical? What about reproduceability? #IAmAResear…
RT @fgodlee: See NEJM on data sharing https://t.co/xrzYDvkacm. Are secondary analyses parasitical? What about reproduceability? #IAmAResear…
RT @davidlazer: A data free critique of data sharing in @NEJM https://t.co/Of4aEXeiFZ, pls provide evidence, any evidence, for any of the a…
Data Sharing the new way in research— NEJM https://t.co/Q30bNpkUmx
RT @cryptogenomicon: Dear @NEJM editors (https://t.co/UAUCRpU8uH): I'd like to introduce you to the US National Academy of Sciences: https:…
RT @cryptogenomicon: Dear @NEJM editors (https://t.co/UAUCRpU8uH): I'd like to introduce you to the US National Academy of Sciences: https:…
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
RT @russpoldrack: NEJM editors: either collaborate with "front-line researchers" or you are a "research parasite" https://t.co/SIOThz6c1M …
RT @MarkkuPeltonen: #Avoin #data voi tuoda mukanaan myös ongelmia. Mahdolliset ongelmat ja haasteet tiedostettava: https://t.co/y14SIiTlCu …
#Avoin #data voi tuoda mukanaan myös ongelmia. Mahdolliset ongelmat ja haasteet tiedostettava: https://t.co/y14SIiTlCu @THLorg
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
RT @Ryan__Schacht: Nice translation of a recent NEJM article https://t.co/nU7IjZEJ1C on #researchparasites https://t.co/iFzSsXSAJp
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @JustinWolfers: The New England Journal calls analyzing data that others collected "parasitic" & comes out against data transparency htt…
No data sharing b/c "concern among front-line researchers that the system will be taken over by research parasites.” https://t.co/PnBwnUdhFM
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
RT @brembs: In which @nejm espouses authority and demonizes scrutiny and skepticism: https://t.co/MokdpV6mN8 #researchparasites https://t.c…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @mbeisen: .@JeffDrazen at @nejm is one of the most shockingly anti-science things ever written https://t.co/CqWWGV8I9V h/t @michaelhoffm…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @davidimiller: People are defending the anti #opendata editorial...whhaaaa?? Secondary data anal is NEEDED for some datasets... https:/…
RT @davidimiller: People are defending the anti #opendata editorial...whhaaaa?? Secondary data anal is NEEDED for some datasets... https:/…
In which MDs don't understand how science works (again) @NEJM #researchparasites https://t.co/ayphLz9IuI
RT @AllenFrancesMD: For shame NEJM: 1)Praised research colloboration with Pharma; 2)Condemns 'research parasites' reanalyzing open data htt…
RT @KBFischer: Stunningly tone-deaf and flat out incorrect editorial in the @NEJM. Ignores all negatives of current system. #EBM https://t…
RT @RLClarkPop: Data Sharing — NEJM. Suggested reading. Comments? https://t.co/iG603qK8oH
RT @RetractionWatch: Wait, it's bad if others "use the data to try to disprove what the original investigators had posited," @nejm? https:/…
RT @chrisdc77: How lame. @NEJM attempts to sow fear, uncertainty & doubt into #opendata by calling secondary data users 'parasites' https:/…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @AllenFrancesMD: For shame NEJM: 1)Praised research colloboration with Pharma; 2)Condemns 'research parasites' reanalyzing open data htt…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
People are defending the anti #opendata editorial...whhaaaa?? Secondary data anal is NEEDED for some datasets... https://t.co/aaKe9Jg8Ym
RT @Protohedgehog: So apparently those who re-use research are “research parasites.” Terrible NEJM editorial.. https://t.co/o2vKPaKlRQ #IAm…
RT @cryptogenomicon: Dear @NEJM editors (https://t.co/UAUCRpU8uH): I'd like to introduce you to the US National Academy of Sciences: https:…
RT @KBFischer: Stunningly tone-deaf and flat out incorrect editorial in the @NEJM. Ignores all negatives of current system. #EBM https://t…
RT @KBFischer: Stunningly tone-deaf and flat out incorrect editorial in the @NEJM. Ignores all negatives of current system. #EBM https://t…
Stunningly tone-deaf and flat out incorrect editorial in the @NEJM. Ignores all negatives of current system. #EBM https://t.co/7LMVurD9WT
RT @cryptogenomicon: Dear @NEJM editors (https://t.co/UAUCRpU8uH): I'd like to introduce you to the US National Academy of Sciences: https:…
RT @HistDem: #IAmAResearchParasite. According to the NEJM, everyone who uses #IPUMS should include me as a coauthor. https://t.co/vWhVqYf66H
RT @AllenFrancesMD: For shame NEJM: 1)Praised research colloboration with Pharma; 2)Condemns 'research parasites' reanalyzing open data htt…
RT @cryptogenomicon: Dear @NEJM editors (https://t.co/UAUCRpU8uH): I'd like to introduce you to the US National Academy of Sciences: https:…
RT @TamarHaspel: Snowed in? Read the weird NEJM anti-data-sharing piece https://t.co/wTkgnMqzTZ And @jpeelle's "translation" https://t.co…
RT @Ryan__Schacht: Nice translation of a recent NEJM article https://t.co/nU7IjZEJ1C on #researchparasites https://t.co/iFzSsXSAJp
Data Sharing #datasharing — @NEJM https://t.co/Xm7e1peGtd
Interesting debate on #data sharing https://t.co/jHucyfIQ1e and https://t.co/QmghF5zzln @yaneslab shares data in @MetaboLights when possible
RT @phylogenomics: Editorial by @nejm is simply deranged https://t.co/WzxpdR4zA8 caling those using published data "research parasites" htt…
RT @cryptogenomicon: Dear @NEJM editors (https://t.co/UAUCRpU8uH): I'd like to introduce you to the US National Academy of Sciences: https:…
RT @AllenFrancesMD: For shame NEJM: 1)Praised research colloboration with Pharma; 2)Condemns 'research parasites' reanalyzing open data htt…
RT @AllenFrancesMD: For shame NEJM: 1)Praised research colloboration with Pharma; 2)Condemns 'research parasites' reanalyzing open data htt…
I for one know how difficult it is to generate data but still, this editorial is so wrong in so many ways https://t.co/YIl7zfDYAM
I thank this editorial https://t.co/YIl7zfmncc that made me finally find out what I have always been; a #researchparasite !! thrilling :)
RT @CoyneoftheRealm: Please bring on the "research parasites." Evidence-based medicine desperately needs them. https://t.co/3OLwOir8Lk http…
RT @wilbanks: First they ignore, then they laugh, then they attack, then you win. Guess we’re into phase three. #researchparasites https://…
RT @MathCancer: I believe the word you're looking for here is "citation", @NEJM. #IAmAResearchParasite https://t.co/fhLCNlVsfr https://t.c…
RT @CoyneoftheRealm: .@NEJM wants to protect reputation of authors who publish faulty data interpretations and erroneous conclusions. https…
RT @AdamEnglerUCSD: Since when does re-analyzing and interpreting someone else's large dataset make you a “research parasite?” #NEJM https:…
Is @NEJM a publication of a bygone era? #iloveresearchparasites https://t.co/wcj5sBfrHa
RT @AllenFrancesMD: For shame NEJM: 1)Praised research colloboration with Pharma; 2)Condemns 'research parasites' reanalyzing open data htt…
RT @Aller_MD: Data Sharing — NEJM https://t.co/vxMCFw5iKx
RT @Aller_MD: Data Sharing — NEJM https://t.co/vxMCFw5iKx
RT @Aller_MD: Data Sharing — NEJM https://t.co/vxMCFw5iKx
RT @Aller_MD: Data Sharing — NEJM https://t.co/vxMCFw5iKx
RT @MMMarksman: If you use others data then you're a "parasite". Wow, can't even fathom how this stinker got to see the light of day https:…
RT @JohndePury: Disparaging data sharing as 'research parasitism' = anti-science https://t.co/x5GPycq7A1
Small LOL at these medical researchers who realize that data is complicated https://t.co/DF5YSYg9Sf
Data Sharing — NEJM https://t.co/FKKm42JiFa #NEJM where did you find this "bullshit editorial generator"? I want one, too!
RT @bengoldacre: NEJM say it's impolite to use someone's data to disprove their hypothesis. Just.. wow. See #IAmAResearchParasite too https…
RT @phylogenomics: Editorial by @nejm is simply deranged https://t.co/WzxpdR4zA8 caling those using published data "research parasites" htt…
RT @AllenFrancesMD: For shame NEJM: 1)Praised research colloboration with Pharma; 2)Condemns 'research parasites' reanalyzing open data htt…
RT @MathCancer: I believe the word you're looking for here is "citation", @NEJM. #IAmAResearchParasite https://t.co/fhLCNlVsfr https://t.c…
RT @Protohedgehog: So apparently those who re-use research are “research parasites.” Terrible NEJM editorial.. https://t.co/o2vKPaKlRQ #IAm…
For shame NEJM: 1)Praised research colloboration with Pharma; 2)Condemns 'research parasites' reanalyzing open data https://t.co/Sv2Ln5cUge
RT @JohndePury: Disparaging data sharing as 'research parasitism' = anti-science https://t.co/x5GPycq7A1
RT @brembs: If nobody checked their data, perhaps @nejm would have fewer retractions? #researchparasites target="_blank" href="https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7">https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7 https://t.…
RT @BrianNosek: .@NEJM Editors reject scientific values of transparency and skepticism. Stunning editorial: https://t.co/t2FJDTvjau https:/…
RT @brembs: If nobody checked their data, perhaps @nejm would have fewer retractions? #researchparasites target="_blank" href="https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7">https://t.co/NUEDn7cNh7 https://t.…