↓ Skip to main content

Tamponade in surgery for retinal detachment associated with proliferative vitreoretinopathy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tamponade in surgery for retinal detachment associated with proliferative vitreoretinopathy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006126.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephen G Schwartz, Harry W Flynn Jr, Wen-Hsiang Lee, Xue Wang

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 62 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Researcher 8 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 11%
Other 5 8%
Other 14 23%
Unknown 10 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 5%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 12 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2020.
All research outputs
#4,880,226
of 15,542,315 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,645
of 11,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,136
of 342,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#145
of 201 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,542,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,212 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.0. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,348 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 201 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.