↓ Skip to main content

Entre o controle e o ativismo hacker: a ação política dos Anonymous Brasil

Overview of attention for article published in História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Entre o controle e o ativismo hacker: a ação política dos Anonymous Brasil
Published in
História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos, December 2015
DOI 10.1590/s0104-59702015000500002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Murilo Bansi Machado

Abstract

This paper addresses the political actions of Anonymous, the principal expression of current hacker activism, arguing that hacktivism is a form of political resistance in control societies. To this end, it focuses on studying the Brazilian, hacktivist facet of the collective. In order to stress its political character, it scrutinizes the principal expressions of hacking in the literature. It describes motivations, methods and the ethics of its political actions, based on a comparative analysis of two operations carried out by Brazilian Anonymous adherents in 2012: #OpWeeksPayment and #OpGlobo. And it finishes by identifying four of its main forms of political engagement: promotion of anonymity; "evangelization;" the formation of distributed networks; and the fact that the collective carries out and facilitates several types of political actions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 11%
Unknown 17 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 4 21%
Student > Master 4 21%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 5 26%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Computer Science 1 5%
Arts and Humanities 1 5%
Other 4 21%
Unknown 6 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2020.
All research outputs
#4,322,886
of 25,658,139 outputs
Outputs from História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos
#316
of 1,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,830
of 397,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age from História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos
#8
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,658,139 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,628 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,043 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.