↓ Skip to main content

Laparoscopic Versus Open Resection for Rectal Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgery, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
32 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Laparoscopic Versus Open Resection for Rectal Cancer
Published in
Annals of Surgery, May 2019
DOI 10.1097/sla.0000000000003072
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sergio A Acuna, Tyler R Chesney, Joshua K Ramjist, Prakesh S Shah, Erin D Kennedy, Nancy N Baxter

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 7 17%
Student > Master 7 17%
Student > Postgraduate 6 14%
Researcher 5 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 12 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 55%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 13 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2019.
All research outputs
#2,079,157
of 24,615,420 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgery
#1,407
of 8,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,391
of 355,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgery
#60
of 154 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,615,420 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,939 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,391 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 154 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.