↓ Skip to main content

The Recovered Memory Debate Continues in Europe: Evidence From the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, France, and Germany

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Psychological Science, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
The Recovered Memory Debate Continues in Europe: Evidence From the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, France, and Germany
Published in
Clinical Psychological Science, October 2018
DOI 10.1177/2167702618803649
Authors

Julia Shaw, Annelies Vredeveldt

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 3 21%
Student > Bachelor 3 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Other 3 21%
Unknown 1 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 9 64%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Neuroscience 1 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 7%
Unknown 2 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2019.
All research outputs
#1,589,175
of 15,739,776 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Psychological Science
#380
of 577 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,321
of 324,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Psychological Science
#10
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,739,776 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 577 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 46.9. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,515 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.