↓ Skip to main content

Clonal Relatedness and Mutational Differences between Upper Tract and Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Cancer Research, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clonal Relatedness and Mutational Differences between Upper Tract and Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma
Published in
Clinical Cancer Research, October 2018
DOI 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-18-2039
Pubmed ID
Authors

François Audenet, Sumit Isharwal, Eugene K. Cha, Mark T.A. Donoghue, Esther N. Drill, Irina Ostrovnaya, Eugene J. Pietzak, John P. Sfakianos, Aditya Bagrodia, Paari Murugan, Guido Dalbagni, Timothy F. Donahue, Jonathan E. Rosenberg, Dean F. Bajorin, Maria E. Arcila, Jaclyn F. Hechtman, Michael F. Berger, Barry S. Taylor, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, Gopa Iyer, Bernard H. Bochner, Jonathan A. Coleman, David B. Solit

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 17%
Student > Master 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 4 7%
Other 10 17%
Unknown 10 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 10%
Sports and Recreations 1 2%
Materials Science 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 15 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2019.
All research outputs
#1,893,344
of 15,788,072 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Cancer Research
#1,490
of 10,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,867
of 324,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Cancer Research
#56
of 167 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,788,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,541 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 167 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.