↓ Skip to main content

Descrição dos casos de síndrome congênita associada à infecção pelo ZIKV no estado de São Paulo, no período 2015 a 2017

Overview of attention for article published in Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Descrição dos casos de síndrome congênita associada à infecção pelo ZIKV no estado de São Paulo, no período 2015 a 2017
Published in
Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, November 2018
DOI 10.5123/s1679-49742018000300012
Pubmed ID
Authors

Renata Soares Martins, Michele Higa Fróes, Leila del Castillo Saad, Satiro Marcio Ignácio, Walkiria Delnero Almeida Prado, Ernesto Machado de Figueiredo, Helena Keico Sato, Flavia Helena Ciccone, Tereza Cristina Guimarães, Gizelda Katz

Abstract

to characterize cases of congenital syndrome associated with Zika virus infection (CZS) and other infectious etiologies, resident in the state of São Paulo, Brazil, from October 30, 2015, to June 30, 2017. this was a descriptive study of suspected cases of CZS and other infectious etiologies notified on the Public Health Events Registry. 960 cases were investigated up to epidemiological week 26/2017, and 146 were confirmed for congenital infection; of these, 59 (40.4%) were confirmed for congenital infection without etiological identification and 87 (59.6%) with laboratory confirmation, of which 55 were congenital syndrome associated with Zika virus and 32 were congenital syndrome associated with other infectious agents. this study enabled the detection of 23.9% CZS cases among suspected cases of infectious etiology.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 16%
Student > Bachelor 6 16%
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 7 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Other 7 19%
Unknown 10 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2018.
All research outputs
#10,961,009
of 13,799,368 outputs
Outputs from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#120
of 236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#235,672
of 310,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,799,368 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 236 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,892 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them