↓ Skip to main content

The Likelihood of Recent Record Warmth

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
68 news outlets
blogs
16 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
166 tweeters
facebook
8 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
Title
The Likelihood of Recent Record Warmth
Published in
Scientific Reports, January 2016
DOI 10.1038/srep19831
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael E. Mann, Stefan Rahmstorf, Byron A. Steinman, Martin Tingley, Sonya K. Miller

Abstract

2014 was nominally the warmest year on record for both the globe and northern hemisphere based on historical records spanning the past one and a half centuries(1,2). It was the latest in a recent run of record temperatures spanning the past decade and a half. Press accounts reported odds as low as one-in-650 million that the observed run of global temperature records would be expected to occur in the absence of human-caused global warming. Press reports notwithstanding, the question of how likely observed temperature records may have have been both with and without human influence is interesting in its own right. Here we attempt to address that question using a semi-empirical approach that combines the latest (CMIP5(3)) climate model simulations with observations of global and hemispheric mean temperature. We find that individual record years and the observed runs of record-setting temperatures were extremely unlikely to have occurred in the absence of human-caused climate change, though not nearly as unlikely as press reports have suggested. These same record temperatures were, by contrast, quite likely to have occurred in the presence of anthropogenic climate forcing.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 166 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 2%
United States 2 2%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Jamaica 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Estonia 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 98 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 30 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 19%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Student > Master 8 7%
Professor 7 6%
Other 20 18%
Unknown 14 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 38 35%
Environmental Science 14 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 6%
Physics and Astronomy 6 6%
Computer Science 4 4%
Other 21 19%
Unknown 19 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 749. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2023.
All research outputs
#23,426
of 23,860,197 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#359
of 128,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#331
of 401,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#6
of 3,212 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,860,197 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 128,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,546 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,212 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.