You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Importance of Social Groups for Retirement Adjustment: Evidence, Application, and Policy Implications of the Social Identity Model of Identity Change
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Social Issues and Policy Review, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1111/sipr.12049 |
| Authors |
Catherine Haslam, Niklas K. Steffens, Nyla R. Branscombe, S. Alexander Haslam, Tegan Cruwys, Ben C. P. Lam, Nancy A. Pachana, Jie Yang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 23% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 15% |
| Australia | 2 | 15% |
| Finland | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 6 | 46% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 31% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 23% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 136 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 22 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 10% |
| Researcher | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 17 | 13% |
| Unknown | 45 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 37 | 27% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 11% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 13% |
| Unknown | 50 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 109. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2019.
All research outputs
#342,588
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Social Issues and Policy Review
#13
of 108 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,064
of 348,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Issues and Policy Review
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 108 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,026 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them