↓ Skip to main content

Modelling materials for solar fuel synthesis by artificial photosynthesis; predicting the optical, electronic and redox properties of photocatalysts

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Modelling materials for solar fuel synthesis by artificial photosynthesis; predicting the optical, electronic and redox properties of photocatalysts
Published in
Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, January 2016
DOI 10.1088/0953-8984/28/7/074001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pierre Guiglion, Enrico Berardo, Cristina Butchosa, Milena C C Wobbe, Martijn A Zwijnenburg

Abstract

In this mini-review, we discuss what insight computational modelling can provide into the working of photocatalysts for solar fuel synthesis and how calculations can be used to screen for new promising materials for photocatalytic water splitting and carbon dioxide reduction. We will extensively discuss the different relevant (material) properties and the computational approaches (DFT, TD-DFT, GW/BSE) available to model them. We illustrate this with examples from the literature, focussing on polymeric and nanoparticle photocatalysts. We finish with a perspective on the outstanding conceptual and computational challenges.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Saudi Arabia 2 5%
Germany 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 40 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 23%
Researcher 8 18%
Student > Master 8 18%
Student > Postgraduate 4 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 9%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 1 2%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 24 55%
Materials Science 6 14%
Engineering 4 9%
Physics and Astronomy 2 5%
Chemical Engineering 2 5%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 5 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2017.
All research outputs
#2,812,308
of 13,044,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter
#283
of 3,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,908
of 334,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter
#3
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,044,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,667 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,420 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.