↓ Skip to main content

Diagnostic value of fine-needle aspiration biopsy for breast mass: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diagnostic value of fine-needle aspiration biopsy for breast mass: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
BMC Cancer, January 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2407-12-41
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ying-Hua Yu, Wei, Jian-Lun Liu

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 81 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 15 18%
Student > Master 13 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Professor 7 8%
Other 21 25%
Unknown 12 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 58%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 11 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2018.
All research outputs
#4,117,548
of 13,710,419 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#1,144
of 5,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,815
of 309,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#143
of 642 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,710,419 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,129 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,290 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 642 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.