↓ Skip to main content

MASK 2017: ARIA digitally-enabled, integrated, person-centred care for rhinitis and asthma multimorbidity using real-world-evidence

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Translational Allergy, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#40 of 490)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
35 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
MASK 2017: ARIA digitally-enabled, integrated, person-centred care for rhinitis and asthma multimorbidity using real-world-evidence
Published in
Clinical and Translational Allergy, October 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13601-018-0227-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. Bousquet, S. Arnavielhe, A. Bedbrook, M. Bewick, D. Laune, E. Mathieu-Dupas, R. Murray, G. L. Onorato, J. L. Pépin, R. Picard, F. Portejoie, E. Costa, J. Fonseca, O. Lourenço, M. Morais-Almeida, A. Todo-Bom, A. A. Cruz, J. da Silva, F. S. Serpa, M. Illario, E. Menditto, L. Cecchi, R. Monti, L. Napoli, M. T. Ventura, G. De Feo, D. Larenas-Linnemann, M. Fuentes Perez, Y. R. Huerta Villabolos, D. Rivero-Yeverino, E. Rodriguez-Zagal, F. Amat, I. Annesi-Maesano, I. Bosse, P. Demoly, P. Devillier, J. F. Fontaine, J. Just, T. P. Kuna, B. Samolinski, A. Valiulis, R. Emuzyte, V. Kvedariene, D. Ryan, A. Sheikh, P. Schmidt-Grendelmeier, L. Klimek, O. Pfaar, K. C. Bergmann, R. Mösges, T. Zuberbier, R. E. Roller-Wirnsberger, P. Tomazic, W. J. Fokkens, N. H. Chavannes, S. Reitsma, J. M. Anto, V. Cardona, T. Dedeu, J. Mullol, T. Haahtela, J. Salimäki, S. Toppila-Salmi, E. Valovirta, B. Gemicioğlu, A. Yorgancioglu, N. Papadopoulos, E. P. Prokopakis, S. Bosnic-Anticevich, R. O’Hehir, J. C. Ivancevich, H. Neffen, E. Zernotti, I. Kull, E. Melen, M. Wickman, C. Bachert, P. Hellings, S. Palkonen, C. Bindslev-Jensen, E. Eller, S. Waserman, M. Sova, G. De Vries, M. van Eerd, I. Agache, T. Casale, M. Dykewickz, R. N. Naclerio, Y. Okamoto, D. V. Wallace

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 124 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 15%
Student > Master 13 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 6%
Professor 8 6%
Researcher 8 6%
Other 28 23%
Unknown 41 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 23%
Social Sciences 8 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 4%
Engineering 4 3%
Other 25 20%
Unknown 47 38%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2019.
All research outputs
#1,102,694
of 16,188,470 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#40
of 490 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,801
of 325,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#8
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,188,470 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 490 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.