↓ Skip to main content

Global Signatures and Dynamical Origins of the Little Ice Age and Medieval Climate Anomaly

Overview of attention for article published in Science, November 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
1764 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1164 Mendeley
citeulike
10 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
Title
Global Signatures and Dynamical Origins of the Little Ice Age and Medieval Climate Anomaly
Published in
Science, November 2009
DOI 10.1126/science.1177303
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael E. Mann, Zhihua Zhang, Scott Rutherford, Raymond S. Bradley, Malcolm K. Hughes, Drew Shindell, Caspar Ammann, Greg Faluvegi, Fenbiao Ni

Abstract

Global temperatures are known to have varied over the past 1500 years, but the spatial patterns have remained poorly defined. We used a global climate proxy network to reconstruct surface temperature patterns over this interval. The Medieval period is found to display warmth that matches or exceeds that of the past decade in some regions, but which falls well below recent levels globally. This period is marked by a tendency for La Niña-like conditions in the tropical Pacific. The coldest temperatures of the Little Ice Age are observed over the interval 1400 to 1700 C.E., with greatest cooling over the extratropical Northern Hemisphere continents. The patterns of temperature change imply dynamical responses of climate to natural radiative forcing changes involving El Niño and the North Atlantic Oscillation-Arctic Oscillation.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 101 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 19 2%
United Kingdom 11 <1%
Canada 6 <1%
Brazil 6 <1%
Spain 5 <1%
Germany 4 <1%
Norway 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Other 24 2%
Unknown 1083 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 248 21%
Researcher 248 21%
Student > Master 141 12%
Student > Bachelor 111 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 57 5%
Other 209 18%
Unknown 150 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 471 40%
Environmental Science 211 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 109 9%
Social Sciences 37 3%
Arts and Humanities 29 2%
Other 97 8%
Unknown 210 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 438. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2023.
All research outputs
#57,668
of 23,935,525 outputs
Outputs from Science
#2,249
of 78,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117
of 170,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#4
of 339 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,935,525 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 78,941 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 63.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,923 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 339 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.