↓ Skip to main content

Tabagismo e pobreza no Brasil: uma análise do perfil da população tabagista a partir da POF 2008-2009

Overview of attention for article published in Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tabagismo e pobreza no Brasil: uma análise do perfil da população tabagista a partir da POF 2008-2009
Published in
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, January 2016
DOI 10.1590/1413-81232015211.16802014
Pubmed ID
Authors

Angelita Bazotti, Manuela Finokiet, Irio Luiz Conti, Marco Tulio Aniceto França, Paulo Dabdab Waquil

Abstract

This paper aims to characterize the Brazilian population who spent money with tobacco products. POF dataset was used from IBGE of the years 2008 and2009. The same definition that IBGE usually use for tobacco consumer was applied, which is someone has spent money with any kind of tobacco products and its derivatives. It was used individual aspects taking into account such as gender, schooling, age (over 14 years old), income lines, regions and ethnics to characterize these populations. Descriptive statistics were employed to estimate the results and the complex sample design of the survey was considered. According to our results, on average, 10% of the Brazilian population have spent money with tobacco products. Besides, these people are older, earn low salaries and have less schooling than someone who does not consume tobacco. Moreover, for this population 1.5% of the family budget is spent on tobacco products. Last but not least, the most of tobacco consumers are men. In general, money which is spent on tobacco products can cause impressive effects on domestic budget because this value could supply other important necessities to the family. Although there are many monitoring and prevention strategies to avoid tobacco consume, deep knowledge about this population that actually consume these products can increase the efficacy of more specific policies.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 21%
Professor 1 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Lecturer 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 10 53%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 21%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 58%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2016.
All research outputs
#7,865,564
of 12,536,156 outputs
Outputs from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#209
of 505 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,440
of 332,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,536,156 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 505 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,892 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.